The social groups in ancient Egypt were pharaoh, vizier, high priests and nobles.
Pharaoh were the kings of ancient Egypt. In Egyptian civilization, the pharaohs were considered living gods. The Egyptians believed that these rulers were direct children of the god Osiris, so they acted as intermediaries between the gods and the Egyptian population.
Vizier was Pharaoh's prime minister and assisted him in managing many kingdom affairs. He had the job of transmitting the king's orders, collecting taxes, administering justice, controlling the state of public works, and also controlling river transport.
High Priests in the social hierarchy below only in Pharaoh. Endued with enormous prestige and power, they were the Priests or responsible for religion and various functions in the administration of the Egyptian Empire. They were considered the wise men of Egypt.
Nobles the third class was intended for the nobles. Among them military chiefs, who were responsible for the security of Egyptian territory.
Amir should probably adopt a(n) "accommodating" conflict-handling style when trying to resolve this matter with Larry.
The accommodating style is one of forfeit, benevolence and low emphaticness. You will surrender pretty much everything so as to save the association with the other party. It is positively sensible to utilize this technique when the current issue is something of little significance to you.
Answer:
The best answer to this question: Interpersonal relationships can develop a unique language, thus creating a "culture" of two, would be: true.
Explanation:
Although the term "culture" relates to many more factors than just language, the fact that two people develop such a unique language, so unique that it only involves the two of them, means that they share a series of conditions that allow them to do so. In this respect, that language makes them both unique and differentiates them from other people, or groups. It shows that these individuals that share an interpersonal relationship also share common customs, traditions, beliefs, and thus from that they can also generate a common language with which only the two of them will understand each other. That´s why the answer is true.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Eliminating the options one after the other;
Option A: Economic Feasibility, involves the study of the cost and statistical understanding of the effect such project would have on the economy. this does not conforms with the issues such as political repercussions as stated in the question above, option A is not the best fit.
Option B: Operational Feasibility, involves a study of how well the operation of such project will be of usefulness or how well would it solve the problem, also this does not relate to the question above.
Option D: This option is best fit to the gap above in the question, because is a test to see if it will conform to requirements, so that it does come back as a crime against the law. it relates to the question above, as it involves political understanding and law such as the information privacy Act, that is why it is the best fit to the above question.
Option D: Technical Feasibility only examines or is carried out to see if the technical functionality will match the requirement needed.
Answer:
Explanation:
Have them compose their own journal entries or letters to loved ones. ... We went hungry, for six days not a morsel of bread or meat had gone in ... In camp, on the march, and in the line of battle, the dog was his constant companion. ... few other things in hand, we lay low I can assure you and the way the ...
