1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vfiekz [6]
3 years ago
9

The characteristics of humanism evidenced by da Vinci’s "Vitruvian Man," include A) idealism and modesty.

History
1 answer:
icang [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: B)

Realism and Individualism

Explanation:

Da Vinci's “Vitruvian Man” was the focus of realism and individualism. Humanism, an intellectual movement which focused on human potential and achievements, was driven by Classical values and traditions. They were cornerstone characteristics of humanism. Artists, such as da Vinci, often created works which used elements of realism, individualism, sharp perspective and other Classical themes.

Hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
Which document stated that the colonists were upset about "taxation without representation"?​
aliina [53]

Answer:

what do you mean by document? The colonist Boycott over the Stamp Act (aka taxation without representation) Oh, I read it wrong in the answer is Stamp Act, lol.

if you want a explanation lmk in comments

hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best summarizes part of the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden?
Fantom [35]
The answer is B, a state can make laws that regulate commerce in neighboring states.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does lucian w. parrish, speech in congress on immigration, reflect deep divisions over the nature of american society during
sertanlavr [38]
<span>Answer: Congress debated a proposal to limits the number of immigrants from Europe, temporarily. Congressman Lucien W. Parrish (a democrat from Texas) vs. Meyer London (a socialist from New York). Parrish's views prevailed, and European immigration was later permanently restricted.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, is taking the law into one's own hands
Svet_ta [14]
The simple answer to your complex question is NO. This is assuming that you live in a country where there are good laws (remember that history is full of bad governments that implemented bad laws) and that law enforcement is effective. Simplisticly, you should only ask yourself this question when your or your families life is being threatened and law enforcement is not around. Your response must still be within the constraints of your laws or you will find yourself in hot water. I'm not even going to try to discuss the ethics and morals that can apply as the situation can vary immensely. Keep it simple - don't operate outside the law, rather fight against unjust laws.
4 0
2 years ago
Begginning in the 1600s what did wealthy Virginia tobacco planters buy
Harrizon [31]

farmland near the coast

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • AP US History question:
    5·1 answer
  • The charts show demographic information. Chart 1: A 3 row and 5 column table. Column 1 contains the following entries: Populatio
    15·2 answers
  • What happened to the land routes after the Ottomans took over?
    8·1 answer
  • What does the word popular sovereignty mean
    15·2 answers
  • 1. Why might the background information above lead you to question the photograph’s reliability?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is payment of bail supposed to guarantee?
    10·1 answer
  • The Lipan Apache used __________, bundles on sticks pulled by horses, to transport their goods.
    11·2 answers
  • War begins in Belgium describe what happened what happened:
    9·1 answer
  • 9) Discuss the positive impacts that WWII had on the American people.​
    12·1 answer
  • Who benefited from taxes? Who is harmed?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!