2 Points
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Correct Answer:
C option: 6 feet
Solution:
Since <span>Yolanda wants to keep the pool in proportion to the model, the ratio of diameter to depth of model and the pool will be same.
Let the depth of pool is x feet. So we can write:
Ratio of Diameter to Depth of Model = Ratio of Diameter to Depth of pool
</span>
<span>
This means the depth of pool should be 6 feet if </span><span>Yolanda wants to keep the pool in proportion to the model.</span>
C option: 6 feet
Solution:
Since <span>Yolanda wants to keep the pool in proportion to the model, the ratio of diameter to depth of model and the pool will be same.
Let the depth of pool is x feet. So we can write:
Ratio of Diameter to Depth of Model = Ratio of Diameter to Depth of pool
</span>
<span>
This means the depth of pool should be 6 feet if </span><span>Yolanda wants to keep the pool in proportion to the model.</span>
Answer: D) 101
Step-by-step explanation:
By linearity, we can break it up into 2 integrals. The integral and derivative of f easily cancel out
I used the table for values of f(x) at 10 and -1. Wouldn't be surprised if this was part of a series of questions about f because I really can't see how you could use the hypothesis that f is twice differentiable on R. Same for the other table values. I'm curious about how you found the answer. Was it a different way?