Answer:
its about checkers cou nt and answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Part A. You have the correct first and second derivative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Part B. You'll need to be more specific. What I would do is show how the quantity (-2x+1)^4 is always nonnegative. This is because x^4 = (x^2)^2 is always nonnegative. So (-2x+1)^4 >= 0. The coefficient -10a is either positive or negative depending on the value of 'a'. If a > 0, then -10a is negative. Making h ' (x) negative. So in this case, h(x) is monotonically decreasing always. On the flip side, if a < 0, then h ' (x) is monotonically increasing as h ' (x) is positive.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Part C. What this is saying is basically "if we change 'a' and/or 'b', then the extrema will NOT change". So is that the case? Let's find out
To find the relative extrema, aka local extrema, we plug in h ' (x) = 0
h ' (x) = -10a(-2x+1)^4
0 = -10a(-2x+1)^4
so either
-10a = 0 or (-2x+1)^4 = 0
The first part is all we care about. Solving for 'a' gets us a = 0.
But there's a problem. It's clearly stated that 'a' is nonzero. So in any other case, the value of 'a' doesn't lead to altering the path in terms of finding the extrema. We'll focus on solving (-2x+1)^4 = 0 for x. Also, the parameter b is nowhere to be found in h ' (x) so that's out as well.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The population in 2003= 47000
Since the population increase by 1200 every year,
in 2004 the population will be 47000+1200
in 2005 the population will be 47000+(1200+1200) which is the same as
47000+2(1200) where 2 is 2 years after 2003,
Therefore the population x years after 2003 is 47000+x(1200).
P= 47000+1200x
b) The population at 2009 which is 6 years after 2003 will be
47000+(1200)*6=47000+7200= 54200
The population at 2009 is 54200,
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>3/4 left and 1/7 of that eaten:</u>
- 3/4 - 3/4(1/7) =
- (3/4) (1 - 1/7) =
- (3/4)(6/7) =
- 18/28 =
- 9/14