23% decrease.
We can do this by simply dividing 1,650,000 by 2,150,000. That would give us 0.7674. Multiply that by 100 and you have 76.74%.
However, this is the percent amount of how 1,650,000 is out of 2,150,000. So, we need to simply minus this answer by 100 to get 23.26, or 23%.
Answer:
SITE A
Explanation:
Given :
FACTOR___ WEIGHT _SITE A_ SITE B _SITE C
Labor Cost __ 0.25 _____92 ____82____ 84
Curr Stability _ 0.35 _____75 ___ 85____ 88
Prox Market __ 0.30 ____ 80 ____50 ___ 60
Taxes _______ 0.10 _____69 ___ 88 ___ 91
SITE A:
(0.25 * 92) + (0.35*75) + (0.30*80) + (0.10*69) = 80.15
SITE B :
(0.25 * 82) + (0.35*85) + (0.30*50) + (0.10*88) = 74.05
SITE C :
(0.25 * 84) + (0.35*88) + (0.30*60) + (0.10*91) = 78.90
Using the weighed factor model;
The based site for locating the facility is SITE A as it has the highest weighted value
I am pretty sure it's to decide if the applicant is creditworthy. ( Makes most sense. Did research too.) :)
Answer:
The answer is:
1 - Underutilization
2 - Efficiency
3 - Unattainability
Explanation:
Efficiency in economics means a situation in which all resources are optimally distributed to serve each entity in the best way while minimizing waste and inefficiency.
Underutilization in economics is also a a situation in which lesser resources are being utilized than the economy is capable of utilizing.
Unattainability is a situation in which what one to accomplish or achieve is not possible.
1 - Underutilization
2 - Efficiency
3 - Unattainability
