Here, we are decide the best option between making the part or buying the part.
a. Make or Buy Analysis
Particulars Make amount Buy amount
Direct Materials $4.50
Direct Labor $1.00
Overhead (80% of Direct Labor) $0.80
Cost to buy <u> </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost per unit <u>$5.70 </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost Difference = $5.70 - $4.70
Cost Difference = $1.00
Therefore, the cost difference of making amount over buying amount is $1.00.
b. Because of the difference, Beto should buy the part because its cost is lesser than to make the part.
Therefore, the buying of the part is the best decision.
See similar solution about Analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/23287319</em>
The FDIC stands for Federal Deposit Insurance Company.
By raising the limit on insured losses the FDIC helps stabilize the system by instilling confidence.
If the consumer knows that their savings accounts are protected up to $250,000 they will be encouraged to spend money during a time of crisis.
Because of the increased limit, there is less probability that there would be something called
"a run on the bank."
Answer:
Expense & revenue summary a/c (credit balance) = $3500
Explanation:
1. Dr Expense & revenue summary 52500
Cr Sales discount 1500
Cr Sales return & allowance 3000
Cr Depreciation expense 25000
Cr Salaries expense 23000
(Close expenses to expense & revenue summary a/c)
2. Dr Sales 56000
Cr Expense & revenue summary 56000
(Close sales to expense & revenue summary a/c)
3. Dr Expense & revenue summary a/c 3500
Cr Retained earning a/c 3500
(To close expense & revenue summary a/c)
4. Dr Retained earning 2000
Cr Expense & revenue summary 2000
(Close dividend to expense & revenue summary a/c)d
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
Answer:
Disruptive innovation.
Explanation:
Disruptive innovation is one that creates the way a market operates, that is it creates a new market and disrupts the old one. Existing firms and products are displaced.
In this instance when Futura Inc. introduced an automobile that could run completely on electricity for longer periods of time than any other electronic or hybrid automobile, it introduced a product that will cause disruptions in the current automobile industry.
Although there was challenges of frequent repairs, this was eventually resolved.
