1. yes. like the jim crow laws. they discriminated against african americans and made things very unfair. it was completely legal, but not moral at all. it’s very inhuman to treat others like that
2. yes. like helping a holocaust victim escape or hide from the nazi’s. it was illegal but people wanted to do it to help and protect them
Answer:
It is a responsibility to obey the law.
Explanation:
The Constitution assumes some civil duties, and these are inherent in the Constitution. For example, the Constitution presumes lawfulness. It is a responsibility, then, to obey the law.
Answer:
Although defined within the context of a media defendant, the rule requiring proof of actual malice applies to all defendants including individuals. The standard can make it very difficult to prevail in a defamation case, even when allegations made against a public figure are unfair or are proved to be false.
Explanation:
C.)Have the other person hold onto the barrel.
Although both murder and euthanasia result in the death of a person, these are very different concepts.
Euthanasia is a practice in which a person's life is purposely ended with the intention of relieving pain and suffering. Euthanasia, therefore, is usually administered to people in terrible conditions, insufferable pain or who suffer terminal diseases. This is a difference with murder, which can take place regardless of the conditions of the person.
Another important difference is that for a death to be considered euthanasia, the person has to consent for his life to be ended. This can also be called assistive sui.cide.
In terms of the law, courts treat these two situations very differently. Virtually all nations that have a code of law condemn murder and punish those who engage in such a practice. Most countries also consider euthanasia to be illegal. However, a number of countries have passed laws to make euthanasia legal under certain circumstances.
