All categories

3 years ago

Through it is seen as a last resort, bankruptcy allows a consumer to

1 answer:

6 0

My credit was recently improved by keinetcybertechnologies AT gmail . com to 820 . A friend referred them to me and now I am able to get a loan. I recommend them to anyone with credit issues.

You might be interested in

If there are too few respondents in the lowest income category, this category may be combined or merged with the next lowest cat

Nostrana [21]

Answer: E) Recoding

Explanation:

Recoding refers to the changing of a variable to better suit the needs for which the variable is being collected.

The variable's parameters can be redefined using recoding to either include more information or less so that the result can be more reflective of the situation on ground.

In mixing the lowest income category with the next lowest, recoding would have occurred.

5 0

3 years ago

In a centralized organization, policies and procedures are usually _____.

dlinn [17]

<span>Mandated by the authority figures in said organization. Even if the policies and procedures seem to be lacking in the wisdom department, the policies and procedures need to be followed to the best of ones abilities as laid out by said authority figures.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

The city of New Orleans has 200 advertising companies, 199 of which employ designers of normal ability at a salary of $100,000 a

zepelin [54]

Answer:

a. $700,000

b. 6/7 or 85.7%

c. No they will not.

Explanation:

a. Jacobs will earn the normal salary that the other designers in the other companies are getting in addition to the incremental income he brings to the company as a result of his talents.

Incremental income = Revenue with Jacobs - Revenue without Jacobs

= 1,000,000 - 400,000

= $600,000

Jacobs earnings = Normal designer earnings + incremental income

= 100,000 + 600,000

= $700,000

b. Economic rent is the excess amount that the company is paying Jacobs over what it should normally cost to get a designer.

Normal cost of designer is $100,000. Company is therefore paying an economic rent of $600,000.

Proportion of Jacobs salary that is economic rent = $\frac{Economic rent}{Jacobs annual earning}$

= $\frac{600,000}{700,000}$

= 6/7 or 85.7%

c. The company hiring Jacobs will not be making an economic profit because for them to make an economic profit they would have to be making more than the $400,000 that the other firms make. They cannot make this amount because for them to do so they would have to reduce the amount they pay Jacobs. If they do so, Jacobs would leave for greener pastures and then they would be making the same $400,000 that the rest are making.

8 0

3 years ago

Both competitive firms and monopolies produce at the level where marginal cost equals marginal revenue. Then, other things rema

maria [59]

Answer:

A. Competitive markets face perfectly elastic demand and marginal revenue, while monopolies face downward-sloping demand and marginal revenue.

Explanation:

In the case when competitive firms and monopolies generated at the level in which the marginal cost is equivalent to marginal revenue keeping the other things constant so the price should be less in the competitive market as compared to the monopoly because in the competitive markets it face perfectly elastic demand but in the monopoly it face the down ward sloping demand curve

Therefore the option a is correct

5 0

3 years ago

Two years ago, Kimberly became a 30 percent partner in the KST Partnership with a contribution of investment land with a $10,000

klio [65]

Answer:

A. $6,000

B. $13,000

Explanation:

A. Calculation to determine Kimberly’s remaining basis in KST after the distribution

Basis in KST$ 15,000

Add §737 gain $3,000

($15,000-$12,000)

Deduct Carryover basis in land ($12,000)

Remaining basis in KST $6,000

($15,000+$3,000-$12,000).

Therefore Kimberly’s remaining basis in KST after the distribution will be $6,000

B. Calculation to determine KST’s basis in the land Kimberly contributed after Kimberly receives this distribution

KST basis upon contribution $10,000

Add Kimberly’s §737 gain $3,000

($15,000-$12,000)

KST’s basis in land $13,000

($10,000+$3,000)

Therefore KST’s basis in the land Kimberly contributed after Kimberly receives this distribution is $13,000

6 0

3 years ago