1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EleoNora [17]
2 years ago
6

When a firm is operating in a perfectly competitive labor market the wage the firm increases with the number of workers hired. t

he firm can buy as much or as little labor as it wants at a fixed, going wage rate. the firm’s marginal expense of labor (MEL) equals the cost of all workers hired.
Business
1 answer:
djverab [1.8K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer: When a firm is operating in a perfectly competitive labor market: <u>"the firm can buy as much or as little labor as it wants at a fixed, going wage rate."</u>

Explanation:

1-  "the wage the firm increases with the number of workers hired" - Is incorrect because The salary paid by the company is treated as a constant salary.

2- Correct.

3- "the firm’s marginal expense of labor (MEL) equals the cost of all workers hired." is  incorrect because the firm’s marginal expense of labor (MEL) is equal to the salary (wage) rate.

You might be interested in
tulip Co. owns 100% of Daisy Co.'s outstanding common stock. Tulip's cost of goods sold for the year totals $600,000, and Daisy'
olasank [31]

Answer:

Cost of goods sold to be reported in  consolidated financial statement = $1,000,000

Explanation:

Whenever there is 100% or more than 50% holding in a company, then equity method is followed under which all of the items are to be consolidated, but in case where there are inter transfers that is transfer from holding to subsidiary or vice-versa then such transactions, profit not realized is to be eliminated.

In case where inventory is transferred to subsidiary after adding profit by holding company, then in case if that inventory is sold to third party by year end then entire profit is recognized even the profit added by holding to cost of goods sold to subsidiary.

Where in case such inventory is not sold further by subsidiary to third party and is still held in the stock then such profit added on sale by holding to subsidiary is eliminated.

In our case the entire inventory is sold to third party by the year end.

Therefore, entire profit will be recognized and cost of goods sold to be shown in consolidated financial statements = $600,000 + $400,000 = $1,000,000.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which government agency is in charge of regulating the sale of stocks and bonds? A. The Interstate Commerce Committee
frutty [35]
The correct answer is; C
8 0
3 years ago
The owner of Cafe Bakka is considering investing in a new point-of-sale system. He spent $10,000 on his current point-of-sale sy
Westkost [7]

Answer

The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.

Explanation  

You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.  

6 0
3 years ago
ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is <u>$16,000</u>, and your total cost of a year of college is <u>$48,000</u> per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually <u>more </u>than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college <u>gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.</u>

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0
2 years ago
In 2009, based on concepts similar to those used to estimate U.S. employment figures, the Japanese adult non-institutionalized p
tigry1 [53]

Answer: 59.27% and 4.77%.

Explanation:

Given that,

In the year 2009:

Japanese adult non-institutionalized population = 110.272 million

Labor force = 65.362 million

Number of people employed = 62.242 million

Japanese labor-force participation rate = \frac{Total\ labor\ force}{Total\ population}

                                                                  =\frac{65.362}{110.272}

                                                                  = 0.5927 or 59.27%

Unemployment rate = \frac{Total\ labor\ force - Number\ of\ people\ employed }{Total\ labor\ force}\times100

                               = \frac{65.362 - 62.242}{65.362}\times100

                               = 4.77%

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A company is going through a rough period owing to faulty management practices, increased bureaucracy, and a lack of strategic p
    9·1 answer
  • Material 1 costs $7 a pound, material 2 costs $5 a pound, and labor costs $15 per hour. Product A sells for $101 a unit, product
    12·1 answer
  • Consolidated financial statements are prepared when a parent-subsidiary relationship exists in recognition of the accounting con
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose Winston's annual salary as an accountant is $60,000, and his financial assets generate $4,000 per year in interest. One
    15·1 answer
  • Lewis Corporation has two service departments: Data Processing and Administration/Personnel. The company also has three division
    14·1 answer
  • Find the no-arbitrage cross exchange rate. The dollar-euro exchange rate is quoted as $1.60 = €1.00 and the dollar-yen exchange
    15·1 answer
  • Please give a complete answer to all questions, citing the legal principle to support your answer.
    10·1 answer
  • Which leadership factor is defined as giving pep talks, asking employees for advice and praising their work, keeping them inform
    10·2 answers
  • If brazil gives up 3 automobiles for each ton of coffee it produces, while peru gives up 7 automobiles for each ton of coffee it
    12·1 answer
  • How do the actions of living on less than you make, saving for large purchases, and sticking to a budget represent deciding acti
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!