Answer:
Brief summary of the case:
The case deals about the evolution of kindle by Company A. When the company decided to introduce kindle, its price was $399 in 2007. Company A understood that to be successful against the huge competitors, kindle must be priced low. It must be highly reliable, many features and elegance must be provided in the design of kindle. "Company A- designed kindle in State C where the research and development expertise is available.
Market research firm "IS," estimated that the manufacturing cost of kindle is about $185. The expensive components of the kindle are the display used in the Electronic ink technology and wireless cord. Company A contracted with Country C's company to produce the display. A manufacturer in Continent A produced a wireless cord of $13. Many components were contracted to the different countries to reduce the cost of the kindle to be competitive. Now, kindle became the competitor to the massive companies.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Electronic reader K in Country U:
If Company had decided to manufacture all the components in Country U, then it would have been more expensive. Company A cannot sell that at an affordable price. Increase in the cost of the components would increase the overall cost of the Electronic reader K. The most important strategy of Company A is to minimize the cost of the product to increase the number of sales.
Increase in the manufacturing cost will dilute their competitive advantage and it increases the cost of the product. It will lower the sales and the buyers would prefer to use the competitors' products, which are cheaper.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Tablet F in Country U:
It would be expensive if they decide to manufacture the components in Country U. It will not affect the sales number like Electronic reader K. as Tablet F is multipurpose. People will prefer quality and specifications than price.
Conclusion:
Manufacturing in Country U would be expensive and it increases the overall cost of the product. It would affect sales of the products.
Answer:
Barb will earn interest on interest yes because she don't retire the interest
Explanation:
a. Barb will earn compound interest both will aearn compound interest.
b. Barb will earn more interest the first year than Andy both are compound annualy. The first year both will earn the same amount of interest.
c. Barb will earn interest on interest yes because she don't retire the interest and reinvest it.
Compound interest (or compounding interest) is interest calculated on the initial principal, which also includes all of the accumulated interest of previous periods of a deposit or loan
d. After five years, Andy will have more money in his account than Barb. No because he spend his interest.
e. Andy will earn more interest the first year than Barb both are compound annualy. The first year both will earn the same amount of interest.
Answer:
The role of project managers is vital for the succcess or failure of project.
Explanation:
The success of projects concentrates on developing key business metrics. However, sometimes development programs are still unsuccessful. There are a number of reasons why these initiatives fail such as lack of funding, weak measurements, lack of coordination among team members, and decisions based on speculations instead of evidence and facts. Such types of issues make it much more difficult for project managers to establish credibility for future projects. Ultimately, the accomplishment or effectiveness of the strategy concentrates entirely on the shoulders of the project manager, and he or she is held responsible for the final outcome.
Answer:
When labor unions successfully bargain for wage rates that are HIGHER THAN the equilibrium wage rate, they may cause AN INCREASE IN STRUCTURAL UNEMPLOYMENT.
Explanation:
When a labor union bargains for wages that are above equilibrium rate, this will produce the same effect as a price floor. The supply of labor will increase, while the demand for labor will decrease. This deadweight loss generated by high wages will result in an excess supply that will eventually lead to higher structural unemployment.