Answer:
Prime cost = $94,000
<em>Conversion cost</em> = $135,400.
Explanation:
<em>Prime cost is the addition of direct material cost , direct labor cost and direct expenses.</em>
<em>Conversion cost is the cost of converting raw materials into finished product. It s the sum of direct labour cost and production overheads.</em>
For Bento Engineering,
<em>Prime cost = direct labour cost (since no figure is given for direct material and direct expenses.)</em>
Prime cost = $94,000
Conversion cost = Direct labour cost + overheads
<em>Conversion cost</em> = $94,000 + 126,000
= $135,400.
Prime cost = $94,000
<em>Conversion cost</em> = $135,400.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the unit cost of goods manufactured is shown below:
<u>Particulars variable costing absorption costing</u>
variable cost of $108 $108
goods manufactured ($1,620,000 ÷ 15,000)
Fixed manufacturing
cost $14
($210,000 ÷ 15,000)
unit cost of goods
manufactured $108 $122
Answer:
A. A captive brand
Explanation:
-A captive brand is when a brand is produced by another party and owned by the retailer but there is no evidence of this and it is only sold by it.
-A complementary brand is when a brand is marketed together with another one to encourage the purchase of both.
-A cooperative brand is when a brand shares a promotion with another one.
-An exclusive brand is a brand that is produced by the retailer and it is sold using its name.
-A generic brand is when a product doesn't have a brand name and it has a lower price than the ones from well-known brands.
According to this, the answer is that the type of private label brand that carries no evidence of a retailer s affiliation, is manufactured by a third party, and is sold exclusively at the retailer is a captive brand.
Answer:
$400,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Development cost incurred = $2,000,000
Amount incurred after the technological feasibility was achieved = $400,000
Now,
The Software development costs that would be capitalized in 20X1
= Cost incurred after achievement of technological feasibility
= $400,000
Answer:
The definition becomes defined in the clarification paragraph below, according to the particular circumstance.
Explanation:
- As either the engineering boss, I believe Sally knows her technical employees better upon where people choose and hate about either the meetings that have been taking place. She understands that her workers like freedom but also that requesting them should report periodically or daily will potentially hinder their efficiency, and also some waste work and attention.
- Therefore, Sally can find some middle ground path somewhere, practically. She might make an option in which those her boss, Mark Hayes, the director of engineering, including her staff should be satisfied with the conclusion reached. Sally would invite Mark please hold a regular meeting to provide a more excellent method rather than just group communication. Any efficiency improvements barely alter a day, cost too much, and often waste precious time. She should indeed, lift all the questions concerning her workers as well as the negatives involved with either the regular interactions.
- She could also ensure fine to measure throughout her workers to hold regular sessions because it will encourage the business to always have a daily transcript of the conversation the week before and whether performance might be enhanced within this meeting can already be covered.
