Hey there,
<span>- To make business competitive
- To limit and prevent monopolies
- To place regulations on prices.
Hope this helps ;))
~Top
</span>
Yes , it’s true. In a known-plaintext attack (kpa), the cryptanalyst can only view a small portion of encrypted data, and he or she has no control over what that data might be.
The attacker also has access to one or more pairs of plaintext/ciphertext in a Known Plaintext Attack (KPA). Specifically, consider the scenario where key and plaintext were used to derive the ciphertext (either of which the attacker is trying to find). The attacker is also aware of what are the locations of the output from key encrypting. That is, the assailant is aware of a pair. They might be familiar with further pairings (obtained with the same key).
A straightforward illustration would be if the unencrypted messages had a set expiration date after which they would become publicly available. such as the location of a planned public event. The coordinates are encrypted and kept secret prior to the event. But when the incident occurs, the attacker has discovered the value of the coordinates /plaintext while the coordinates were decrypted (without knowing the key).
In general, a cipher is easier to break the more plaintext/ciphertext pairs that are known.
To learn more about Plaintext Attack click here:
brainly.com/question/28445346
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes, but this must be done before the withdraw deadline
Explanation:
TopHat is an online learning platform. Students register for courses and if they decide not to continue with a course for reasons best known to them, they are allowed a time period usually one to two weeks to drop the courses. They are then reimbursed the fee for that particular course.
But if that time period elapses and they drop the course, that is considered a withdrawal that is not accepted and which no provisions for reimbursements are made.
