It is C: Airlines
under the airlines deregulation act, the federal law removed the government's control over fares route and market entry however the act should not remove or diminish overall aspect of air safety by the federal aviation administration.
Answer:
b. the supply of ivory has fallen, leading to an increase in price and reward for poaching.
Explanation:
In Economics, there are primarily two (2) factors which affect the availability and the price at which goods and services are sold or provided, these are demand and supply.
The law of demand states that, the higher the demand for goods and services, the higher the price it would be sold all things being equal. On the other hand, law of supply states that the higher the price of goods and services, the lower the supply.
Poaching can be defined as an illegal or illegitimate procurement (purchase) of protected wildlife living organisms such as elephants, fish, trees, gaming, etc.
In an attempt to reduce poaching of elephant tusks for ivory, officials in Kenya burned illegally gathered ivory. Economists tend to point out that the supply of ivory has fallen, leading to an increase in price and reward for poaching in accordance with the law of supply.
This ultimately implies that, an increase in the price level of a product usually results in a decrease in the quality of real output demanded along the aggregate demand curve.
Answer:
The sales unit to achieve a target profit of $6,250 is 545 units
The sales units to achieve to achieve a target profit of $9,400 is 590 units
Explanation:
The quantity at target profit=fixed cost+target profit/contribution per unit
fixed expense=$31,900
target profit $6,250
contribution per unit=$140-$70
=$70
unit sales at a target profit of $6,250=($31,900+$6,250)/$70
=545 sales units
fixed expenses $31900
target profit of $9400
contribution per unit is $70
unit sales at a target profit of $9,400=($31900+$9400)/$70
=590 sales unit
Answer:
These are examples of <u><em>WANTS!</em></u>
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: Greater
For example, let's say that there is a company that make vehicles with no pollutant for the environment.
The government in this situation might provide the company with incentives with the reason that the amount of incentive is smaller compared to the amount of expense that the government had to spend to fix the damage to the environment.
