1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mario62 [17]
2 years ago
10

Cubists created artworks that depicted objects as

History
2 answers:
Pavel [41]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: Flattened and Abstract.

The art of cubism is a movement that started on 1907 in Paris. Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque began creating their art in this form to break free from the traditional style of painting.

The art of cubism involves creating a painting that rejects a single viewpoint. Cubists decided to create their art in multiple viewpoints which come together in a single fragmented painting.

dusya [7]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

flattened and abstract

Explanation:

correct on apex

You might be interested in
The large Egyptian homes had<br> in the center.<br> courts<br> Pools<br> temples<br> commons
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

I believe the answer would be courts

Explanation: pools would be extremely hard to make and temples were usely huge. commens could also make sence

4 0
3 years ago
Can you please explain the concept of informal amendments and how they differ from formal amendments?
Eva8 [605]
A "Formal Amendment" is one that actually adds to or changes the US Constitution. It is ratified by the states and becomes law. An "informal amendment"is a change to the meaning or interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. There is no real informal way to change the Constitution, and it's not an actual change to the wording of the Constitution; rather, it's the way we perceive the Constitution that changes. The one that comes to mind is the equal rights amendment (1972) - which prohibits the inequality of men and women. Opponents say that the amendment is no longer needed, as the issues
4 0
3 years ago
How did Christianity influence India?
fgiga [73]

Answer:

It Involved this stablishment of a high quality schools . Missionaries were responsible for English pioneering and vernacular education. GOD Bless Have a nice day!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Mandela’s tactics differ from Gandhi’s? (Gandhi believed in nonviolent protest)
nadezda [96]

SIMILARITIES —The depth of oppression in South Africa created Nelson Mandela, a revolutionary par excellence, and many others like him: Oliver Tambo, Walter Sisulu, Albert Lutuli, Yusuf Dadoo and Robert Sobukwe — all men of extraordinary courage, wisdom, and generosity. In India, too, thousands went to jail or kissed the gallows, in their crusade for freedom from the enslavement that was British rule. In The Gods are Athirst, Anatole France, the French novelist, seems to say to all: “Behold out of these petty personalities, out of these trivial commonplaces, arise, when the hour is ripe, the most titanic events and the most monumental gestures of history.”

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi spent his years in prison in line with the Biblical verse, “Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.” Nelson Mandela was shut off from his countrymen for 27 years, imprisoned, until his release on February 11, 1990. Both walked that long road to freedom. Their unwavering commitment to nationalism was not only rooted in freedom; it also aspired towards freedom. Both discovered that after climbing a great hill, one only finds many more to climb. They had little time to rest and look back on the distance they had travelled. Both Mandela and the Mahatma believed freedom was not pushed from behind by a blind force but that it was actively drawn by a vision. In this respect, as in many other ways, the convergence of the Indian and South African freedom struggles is real and striking.

Racial prejudice characterised British India before independence as it marred colonial rule in South Africa. Gandhi entered the freedom struggle without really comprehending the sheer scale of racial discrimination in India. When he did, however, he did not allow himself to be rushed into reaction. The Mahatma patiently used every opportunity he got to defy colonial power, to highlight its illegitimate rule, and managed to overcome the apparently unassailable might of British rule. Gandhi’s response to the colonial regime is marked not just by his extraordinary charisma, but his method of harnessing “people power.”

Nelson Mandela used similar skills, measuring the consequences of his every move. He organised an active militant wing of the African National Congress — the Spear of the Nation — to sabotage government installations without causing injury to people. He could do so because he was a rational pragmatics.

DIFFERENCES—Both Gandhi and Nelson Mandela are entitled to our affection and respect for more than one reason. They eschewed violence against the person and did not allow social antagonisms to get out of hand. They felt the world was sick unto death of blood-spilling, but that it was, after all, seeing a way out. At the same time, they were not pacifists in the true sense of the word. They maintained the evils of capitulation outweighed the evils of war. Needless to say, their ideals are relevant in this day and age, when the advantages of non-violent means over the use of force are manifest.

Gandhi and Mandela also demonstrated to the world they could help build inclusive societies, in which all Indians and South Africans would have a stake and whose strength, they argued, was a guarantee against disunity, backwardness and the exploitation of the poor by the elites. This idea is adequately reflected in the make-up of the “Indian” as well as the “South African” — the notion of an all-embracing citizenship combined with the conception of the public good.

At his trial, Nelson Mandela, who had spent two decades in the harsh conditions of Robben Island, spoke of a “democratic and free society in which all persons live in harmony and with equal opportunities. […] It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve, but if need be, an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”

The speed with which the bitterness between former colonial subjects and their rulers abated in South Africa is astonishing. Mandela was an ardent champion of “Peace with Reconciliation,” a slogan that had a profound impact on the lives of ordinary people. He called for brotherly love and integration with whites, and a sharing of Christian values. He did not unsettle traditional dividing lines and dichotomies; instead, he engaged in conflict management within a system that permitted opposing views to exist fairly.

7 0
3 years ago
The North had more manpower than the South during the Civil War. True False
saw5 [17]
I think the correct answer is true
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Usurpation of indigenous lands under Díaz accelerated as a result of the
    12·1 answer
  • If your emotional energy is low, your attitude will likely
    14·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a national symbol for the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • Damdamin at saloobin​
    15·1 answer
  • Roosevelt's "new nationalism" select one:
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following countries were part of the Eastern Bloc? Check all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • Who completed the expedition outlined on the map above? A. Cartier B. La Harpe C. La Salle D. Jolliet
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following has the greatest impact on human settlement in Iraq?
    12·2 answers
  • Trick question:<br> Who's the president of the USA
    7·2 answers
  • Some scientists are planning to install the world's largest telescope on Hawaii's tallest mountain. It will be good for science.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!