Mortgage payments, as well as student loans, are classified as credit.
It should be noted that assets are belongings, what one owns, since loans and periodic payments thereon are examples of borrowing or credit, it means assets cannot be obligations, as a result, the option with assets is not relevant in this case.
Secondly, credit means what one owes, obligations that one would make payments in order to discharge them in the future, without mincing words, mortgage payments and student loans fit into this categorization, the correct option, in this case, is option B
Also, collateral is required as a form of equity or contribution when one takes out a loan to finance the purchase of an asset.
Lastly, income refers to earnings and borrowings are not related to income, making it safe to conclude that option D is also nonapplicable to the question at hand.
Kindly find a detailed explanation of credit in the link provided below:
https://brainly.in/question/862848
#SPJ1
B. he was overthrown causing the process to move slower until he was elected again in 1993, hope i helped, please tag me if need help :)
<span>Madison didn’t originate the idea of checks and balances for limiting government power, but he helped push it farther than anyone else before or since. Previous political thinkers, citing British experience, had talked about checks and balances with a monarch in the mix, but Madison helped apply the principle to a republic. Contrary to such respected thinkers as Baron de Montesquieu, Madison insisted checks and balances could help protect liberty in a large republic.
AMONG the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice. He will not fail, therefore, to set a due value on any plan which, without violating the principles to which he is attached, provides a proper cure for it. The instability, injustice, and confusion introduced into the public councils, have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished; as they continue to be the favorite and fruitful topics from which the adversaries to liberty derive their most specious declamations. The valuable improvements made by the American constitutions on the popular models, both ancient and modern, cannot certainly be too much admired; but it would be an unwarrantable partiality, to contend that they have as effectually obviated the danger on this side, as was wished and expected. Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority. However anxiously we may wish that these complaints had no foundation, the evidence, of known facts will not permit us to deny that they are in some degree true. It will be found, indeed, on a candid review of our situation, that some of the distresses under which we labor have been erroneously charged on the operation of our governments; but it will be found, at the same time, that other causes will not alone account for many of our heaviest misfortunes; and, particularly, for that prevailing and increasing distrust of public engagements, and alarm for private rights, which are echoed from one end of the continent to the other. These must be chiefly, if not wholly, effects of the unsteadiness and injustice with which a factious spirit has tainted our public administrations.</span>
Concerned about the Catholic minority in Maryland, Leonard Calvert ordered the Second Lord Baltimore to <span> c. make a law requiring Catholics to practice their faith quietly and privately.</span>
Answer:
Different religions was well treated by rulers of the Arab empire.
Explanation:
All the rulers of Arab empire were Muslims so they allow the people of different religions to follow their own religion because the holy book Quran forbid the Muslim rulers to force conversion of non-Muslims to Islam. These Arab rulers only impose low taxes on the people of other religion and in return the Muslims ruler provide security to their property and family.
