Answer:
Check below for explanations
Explanation:
A legal rule is one made and enforced by social or governmental organizations to guide and regulate the conduct of the people in a society while ethical responsibilities are morally based obligations that individuals and groups have towards each other, and their abilities to interpret and act upon these ethical standards.
Ethical standards are not the bases for forming legal rules and vice-versa. Some conducts may conform to legal standards but may not uphold the ethical principles of a particular society. Some legal requirements are not ethically required and some ethical requirements are also not necessarily supported by law. This makes legal rules insufficient for fulfilling ethical responsibilities.
A cosmetic company using a popular drug addict, who also is a musician as a brand ambassador does not break any legal rules but fails in their ethical responsibilities. This is because this act can promote the rate of drug addiction among young people.
The slave trade was legal in Europe in the mid seventeen century, but this out-rightly opposes ethical standards because the people that were traded as slaves during these periods were not made to enjoy their human right. This was legal because it was accepted by the European governments.
Secularism? I think. Just answered similar question
The answer is a "Hermit".
A hermit is a man who lives alone and apart from society, for the most part for religious reasons. In Christianity, the term was initially connected to a Christian who carries on with the eremitic life out of a religious conviction, to be specific the Desert Theology of the Old Testament i.e., the 40 years meandering in the desert that was intended to cause a change in heart.
Why would the U.S. annex Hawaii? First of all, Hawaii is a wonderful addition to our great country. It allows for people to travel to exotic locations at the same time as not needing a passport or worries about hassle with international travel. Another reason would be because there is no reason to. The more land we have, is the better. The last reason is other people could take Hawaii. Why would we want to give another country an island? They could use it for nuclear testing or something crazy. Therefore, it's safe and reasonable to keep Hawaii.
