Answer:
a. Show her the list and then take it away and have her testify from her 'refreshed recollection.'
Explanation:
In the given scenario Gloria testifies that when she came to work the day after the robbery, she noticed that large amounts of inventory were missing. She spent the entire day cataloguing the missing items.
In the trial she said she can remember what was stolen.
Under rule 612 the prosecutor is allowed to.show her the list and them take it away. Gloria can now testify from her refreshed memory.
On the other hand if she said she could recall the items the prosecutor would have under the hearsay exception (rule 803 (5)) requested she state the missing items.
But in this case she said she cannot recall the items
Answer:
Q=120−4P
Explanation:
putting P = 20 we get
q= 40
we know that elasticity is quantity demanded / price
20
40
=2
hence the correct option: D
Answer:
Cashflow from Operating Activities
Net Income $120,400
Adjastment for Non-Cash Items
Depreciation $5,300
Amortization $3,400
Adjastments of Items appearing elsewhere
Loss from the sale of land $4,000
Net Cash flow from operating activities $133,100
Explanation:
Net Income is reconciled in the cashflow statement via the indirect method. Its is adjasted for Non-Cash Items, Items appearing elsewhere in the cashflow statement and Working Capital Movements
Answer:
Expenses will be understated, hence, Net Income will be overstated.
Rent prepaid will be overstated, hence, current assets will be overstated.
Explanation:
Ordinarily, rent prepaid is meant to be credited every month to the tune of the the value that has been consumed and then added to period expenses to reduce net income.
In the statement of Financial Position, the same amount that has been consumed should be used to reduce balance in rent prepaid account, otherwise, current assets will be overstated if no adjustment is made.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Explanation:
Intentional infliction of emotional distress or IIED is a common law applied when an individual causes emotional distress to another person intentionally by behaving inappropriately. Intentional infliction of emotional distress is usually accompanied by physical injuries.
