Answer:
Maybe is against the community
Explanation:
Keeping track of common files by using a lot of computers and mobiles all through the day may be hard. A good example is when you synchronized your mobile and computer devices. If you check an email using your computer, it will also appear in your smartphone. This will be a lot easier to track your email through both of your devices than having not to be synced at all.
The answers are as follows:
a) F(A, B, C) = A'B'C' + A'B'C + A'BC' + A'BC + AB'C' + AB'C + ABC' + ABC
= A'(B'C' + B'C + BC' + BC) + A((B'C' + B'C + BC' + BC)
= (A' + A)(B'C' + B'C + BC' + BC) = B'C' + B'C + BC' + BC
= B'(C' + C) + B(C' + C) = B' + B = 1
b) F(x1, x2, x3, ..., xn) = ∑mi has 2n/2 minterms with x1 and 2n/2 minterms
with x'1, which can be factored and removed as in (a). The remaining 2n1
product terms will have 2n-1/2 minterms with x2 and 2n-1/2 minterms
with x'2, which and be factored to remove x2 and x'2, continue this
process until the last term is left and xn + x'n = 1
<span>The statement that "Persons who have been given access to an installation can be counted on to be of no threat" is false. If they are not honest enough, they could become the dangerous staff the company could ever had because he or she has access to everything, files, information, etc. That is why, in selecting a person to be trusted with such responsibility, he or she undergoes an intensive training.</span>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
All three of A, B and C are required to harden a host. Thus, All of the above makes the best option.
Hardening simply refers to making your data impossible to be penetrated. More like bulletproof.
To do this, ensure measures like
- Regular Program cleanup
- Patches management
- service pack installation
- service or usage policies
...among others.
Cheers
