Based on the costs incurred by Kasper Corporation to make the commercial-grade cooking griddle, the total cost per unit is <u>$55.00.</u>
<h3>What is Kaspar Corporation's cost per unit?</h3>
This can be found as:
= Direct materials + Direct labor + Variable manufacturing overhead + Fixed manufacturing overhead per unit + Variable selling and administrative expenses + Fixed selling and administrative expenses per unit
Solving gives:
= 17 + 8 + 11 + (300,000 / 30,000) + 4 + (150,000 / 30,000)
= $55
Find out more on the total cost of produced units at brainly.com/question/18089483.
#SPJ1
21 tasks, if you use your lunch break and your 2 15 minute breaks
Answer:
The answer is "Develop and implement security and resilience programs for the critical infrastructure under their control, while taking into consideration the public good as well".
Explanation:
In the past, industrial control systems were generally not connected to IT networks and did not contain complex computing capabilities; therefore, they could be adequately protected using physical security measures like locks and fences. However, as OT has become more integrated with IT, such physical measures are becoming less adequate in securing the underlying critical assets.
Answer:
The Money supply will decrease by $4,500
Explanation:
What will be the maximum impact on money supply today as a result of your action is that the Money supply will decrease by $4,500.
Since we assumed that you have $10,000 in your account in which you withdraw $500 cash from your account and hide it under your pillow for future use, therefore based this scenario or actions carried by you it means that your bank have fewer or lesser funds available to make loans which means the decrease will tend to affect the money supply.
Hence, you can easily calculate the effect by using the simple money multiplier.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.
