Answer: Kim-Lord model
Explanation: Some purchases made by consumers require a high degree of involvement such as cars, mobile phones etc on both cognitive and affective levels. Others do not. This phenomenon is explained by the Kim-Lord grid model of cognitive response from highly effective advertisements. The model states that purchase related decisions of consumers are based on or is highly influenced by affective and cognitive factors and that all aspects of advertising should be focused on these areas.
Answer:
March 12 Medical waste expense 9100 Dr
Accounts Payable 9100 Cr
March 31 Accounts Payable 9100 Dr
Cash 9100 Cr
Explanation:
To record the services we received and have not paid for, we simply charge the service received as an expense and debit it and credit the Accounts Payable against it.
We use the relevant name for the service that we have created in our books. In this case, I have used the name Medical waste Expense.
The terms 2/10 n/30 means a 2% discount can be enjoyed by Grace Hospital if it pays the creditor within 10 days of receiving the service while n/30 means that the payment is to be made within the next 30 days from the day when service is received.
Grace doesn't pay for the services in the first 10 days there by missing on the discount and the whole amount is paid on 31 march. We debit the Accounts Payable as the liability has been settled and credit the cash through which payment is made.
Answer:
a. what is Suncoast's current debt ratio?
debt ratio = liabilities / equity = $400,000 / $600,000 = 0.67
b. what would the new debt ratio be if the machine were leased? if it is purchased?
if X-ray machine is leased, debt ratio = $400,000 / $600,000 = 0.67
if X-ray machine is purchased, debt ratio = $600,000 / $600,000 = 1
c. is the financial risk of the business different under the two acquisition alternatives?
yes, because a higher debt ratio means that the company is under a higher financial stress since it has more outstanding loans, which increases the financial risk.
Let’s look at the facts,
Original Investment: $80,000
Income: $150,000/ year
Salary: $105,000
New space: $22,000
Income: $150000
- Salary: $105000
- New Space: $22000
======================
Profit: $23000/ year
After 3 years they would have made, $69,000
Now had they left the original $80000 invested @ a rate of 15% annually (assuming its compounded), after 3 years they would have $121,670
So economically speaking, they didn’t make the right choice
False should be the answer
