Answer: got it wrong so don't pick this one
Explanation:
Clara is suing David because of a property dispute. Clara and David are from different states, so it is not readily clear which state has jurisdiction over this case. Which of the following is true?
Jurisdiction can fall in whichever state has subject matter or personal jurisdiction, likely depending on which state Clara feels will give her a more favorable outcome for her case.
<em>Jurisdiction depends solely on where the property - the focus of the dispute - is located. Wrong answer</em>
Jurisdiction falls in Clara's state of residence, since she is the plaintiff.
Jurisdiction falls in David's state of residence, since he is the one being summoned to court.
FEEDBACK
0 / 3 (0.0%)
Several courts could potentially have jurisdiction. It is most likely that Clara will forum shop for the jurisdiction that would most likely operate in her favor.
Answer:B. Instead of requesting Oak and Beach wood grown specifically on Hardwood's Land Taylor request shipment of Oak and Beach wood from Hardwood, and specifies in the contract that if Hardwood cannot supply the wood then Hardwood should obtain the requested wood from another Lumber supplier.
C. After the Tornadoes Hardwood and Taylor agreed to a novation where a competing company, Oakempire assumes the duty of Hardwood stated in the original contract.
Explanation:
As regards B option of the answer, Taylor having put a clause in the contract requesting Hardwood to seek supply from another Lumber supplier if unable to meet the demand will make the contract binding on Hardwood
The entry into a novation with Oakempire after the Tornadoes makes the contract binding on Oakempire to deliver as stated in the contract for he has legally assumed the position of Hardwood.
The A and C options of the answer are still cases of contract frustration i.e the loss is beyond the control of the contracting parties , it's an act of God and insurer does not cover such. The first frustration is from new legislation and second is by natural disaster.
Answer:
Option A) The firm's net income increases.
Explanation:
The residual dividend model always tries to pay its debts with retained earnings, therefore, it can increase its net income through time because in the upcoming years it does not have to use its operational earnings on debts.
In this way, you can maximize the dividend per share over time by improving your net income.
Answer:
The term IDS refers to a system that listens to network traffic to detect abnormal or suspicious activities, and thus reduce the risk of intrusion.
Explanation:
Its advantages are
•They are connected in network segments, so with a single IDS you can detect attacks on all computers connected to that segment
•They are independent of the mobile platform by the different teams in the network.
•These are attacks to detect attacks detected in the detection of IP attacks or denial of service attacks that can block the server.
-They can behave as if they were invisible to attackers.
Its disadvantages are
•They are ineffective in systems with encrypted traffic.
•Its operation becomes difficult in network environments detected in high-speed computers, since they usually reach Gbps speeds, preventing the IDS from analyzing all packets on time.
•If there is momentary network congestion, the IDS could start losing packets.
•Because they operate in heterogeneous environments (Windows, Linux, etc.) they may not be able to define the relevance of an attack on each platform.
Answer:
1.67
Explanation:
The computation of multi-factor productivity is shown below:-
Multi-factor productivity = Potential leads × Number of workers × Fee × Conversion percentage ÷ Labor cost + Material cost + Overhead cost
= 3,500 × 4 × $60 × 0.03 ÷ 4 × 40 × $35 + $1,500 + $8,000
= 25,200 ÷ 15,100
= 1.67
Therefore for computing the multi-factor productivity we simply applied the above formula.