1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sp2606 [1]
3 years ago
11

Why Did Nazi Leaders Choose to move Toward Hitler's "Final Solution"?

History
2 answers:
WITCHER [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Hitler decided to murder Europe's Jews. The decision was probably ... The Nazi leaders envisioned killing 11 million Jews as part of the “Final Solution.

Explanation:

tester [92]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Hitler decided to murder Europe's Jews. The decision was probably ... The Nazi leaders envisioned killing 11 million Jews as part of the “Final Solution.

You might be interested in
Which of the following was a good reason for the growth of cities in the late 1800’s
AlexFokin [52]
C) Too many people were already living in rural or country areas
4 0
3 years ago
What's the answer? <br>A. B. C. or D? ​
Sidana [21]

Answer:

theories is the only word which fits

7 0
2 years ago
Why did the United States change its plans to invade Japan?​
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

Unified command was decided to be necessary for the invasion, interservice rivalry over who it would be was so serious it derailed planning

6 0
3 years ago
What Native American groups stood in the way of this expansion?
avanturin [10]

Answer:

This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw, and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.

Combatants: Seminole

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Plzzz help ASAP I will mark brainliest!!!!
Mkey [24]

<h3>I spent a few years writing about the federal lawsuit of ACLU vs. Yakima, which would become a landmark voting rights lawsuit in Washington state. I remember at the time regular folks, politicians and government officials (all of them white and older) that there was no longer any such thing as voter suppression in the United States of America. That had all been settled in the 1960s, they argued, and the idea that such racist practices existed still today was speculative at best and, besides, impossible to prove. The city lost the lawsuit and was ordered to pay nearly $2 million to the ACLU in addition to a similar number the city wasted litigating the case. The ruling led a few other Central Washington cities with growing (and ignored) Latino populations to preemptively change their council election systems to legally provide for more representation. A couple years later Evergreen State lawmakers approved a state voting rights act to increase representation. Unfortunately, positive developments in Washington state haven’t been seen around much of the country. For nearly a decade, much of the country has gone backwards on voting rights.</h3>

<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one reason Thomas Paine believes that the youth of the colonies is an advantage against Britain
    7·1 answer
  • List of how many times the brewers in the world series
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Neolithic Period drive political change?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the most common type of
    15·2 answers
  • How did Abraham Lincoln win such a large victory in the 1860 election when he was running against three other candidates?
    14·1 answer
  • What type of goverment does samoa have,also explain 5 different parts of culture
    8·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP PLZ
    5·2 answers
  • Conclusión del comercio en China​
    15·1 answer
  • Pls help i'll mark you the brainlest
    10·2 answers
  • I need help with questions in my history class
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!