The correct answer is turning point for the way the laws of colonial Virginia distinguished people of different races
In 1676, one hundred years before the declaration of independence, the state of Virginia was the scene of the so-called Bacon Rebellion, in which landowners, slaves and servants came together, and which can only be stifled with the dispatch of English troops. It began as a product of the demand of the wealthy landowner Nathaniel Bacon, whose properties were located in the border area, for a more effective war policy against "the Indian". This demand to local authorities extended to the denunciation of an unfair tax policy, the arbitrary distribution of public offices and the lack of protection for farmers against the indigenous threat, in “a mixture of populist resentment against the rich and border hatred against the Indians ”. (Apart from the huge historical-social distances, we could say that it is similar to a Trump that today rages against the political and economic establishment while agitating a strongly xenophobic and anti-immigrant program).
The significance of this rebellion was that it brought together a heterogeneous social spectrum, attracting the dissatisfaction of slaves and servants against their living conditions, showing a potentially dangerous social union. In addition to the problem of indigenous hostility and the danger of slave revolts, the colonial elite had to do with the class anger of the poor whites - the servants, the tenants, the urban poor, the landless, the taxpayers, soldiers and sailors. In fact, after the Bacon Rebellion in 1760, "eighteen new attempts were made to overthrow the colonial governments and eight black revolts in South Carolina and New York." (The Other History of the United States). In this context, racism was the preferred ideological artifact used by the dominant classes to prevent the development of these social ties. But under the strong fiscal pressure that ensued the wars waged by England, which increased poverty in the lower strata and affected sectors of the local elites, they began to defend nationalist ideals as a way to monopolize the extraction of resources while unleashing potential rebellions. depending on national unity.
The correct answer to this question is B. NAFTA has established the largest free trade zone in the world.
A guerrilla warfare is a paramilitary group used during combat, to fight a larger military group. The use of guerrilla warfare during wartime includes ambushes, sabotage, and even raids. These groups are similar to the flexible response in the sense that they are both military strategy. Flexible response was first used by US President John F. Kennedy as a military strategy during the cold war and it refers to the status quo of heavily armed war not limited to nuclear arms. In simple terms, Flexible Response is the capability to annihilate your enemy as it destroys you completely, calling for the prevention of attacks. Even though both terms represent strategic approaches to war, they wage different results. In a sentence, guerrilla warfare leverages power of military groups without compromising the whole power of the army, while flexible response uses the whole power of an army to wage on stability and status quo.
Expanded farming and ranching opportunities
