1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leokris [45]
3 years ago
14

which of the following was not a pre-Aztec mesoamerican civilization a. the Inuit b. the olmecs c. the Toltecs d. the Maya

History
2 answers:
aliina [53]3 years ago
6 0
A) The Inuit were not a Pre-Aztec Mesoamerican civilization. The Inuits are a still an ethnic group which exists today and they inhabit the regions of Canada, Alaska and Greenland, specifically the Arctic regions of these countries. They are an indigenous group.
Alla [95]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Inuit

Explanation:

i took the test hope this helps

You might be interested in
Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
iren2701 [21]

Answer:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation: Read this and you'll find your answer~!

7 0
3 years ago
1. What common purpose united the
mojhsa [17]

As a result, for the most part, the English colonies in the North America were business ventures. They provided an outlet fir England’s surplus population and (in some cases) more religious freedom than England did, but their primary putpose was to make money for their sponsors.
3 0
3 years ago
Why did the American work force grow in the late 1800's?
BARSIC [14]

The American work force grew in the 1800s because industrialization created new jobs. ... There were no child labor laws, factories needed as many workers as they could get, families needed as much money as they could get, and children had smaller fingers and hands, making them ideal for some more precise jobs.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is the meaning of the quote "Without feelings of respect, what is there to distinguish men from beast"
Leya [2.2K]
The meaning of the quote "Without feeling of respect, what is there to distinguish men from beast" is a saying that humans have a certain level of consciousness that separates us from any other creature. We he created this type of society where we are expected to uphold certain standards, unlike our more primitive counterparts. 
7 0
3 years ago
Which event turned the tide of the conflict in the Ohio Valley?
erastova [34]
Final victory was attained at the Battle of Fallen Timbers in 1794, after which settlers enjoyed a level of security and stability to that point unknown on the <span>frontier.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLZ ANSWER ASAPPPPPP
    10·2 answers
  • 3. World War I ended in 1918, but the Treaty of Versailles left many issues unresolved and in 1939, World War II began. In a bri
    10·1 answer
  • What impact did john f kennedy have on america? Explain
    10·1 answer
  • Give meanings of the the following word Accession​
    6·1 answer
  • Yahweh, the god of the Israelites, whose name was revealed to Moses as four Hebrew consonants (YHWH) called the tetragrammaton.
    12·1 answer
  • Which best defines the phrase "end of the Cold War"?
    9·2 answers
  • Progressive reformers tried to remedy problems created by and urbanization through political action.
    6·2 answers
  • We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provi
    12·2 answers
  • How did the schooling of Native American children attempt to assimilate them into American culture?
    6·1 answer
  • Refer to the map below to answer the following question:
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!