Answer:
The law did not pass a judicial review.
Explanation:
Supreme court has the power to conduct a judicial review every time the congress proposed for a new legislation.
During the review, the supreme court will carefully examine every content of the proposed legislations. If any part of the contents violated the rules written within the constitution, that legislations would be considered as "unconstitutional" and need to undergone a revision before it can be passed.
Answer:
The need to have better protection led to innovations in tools and weapons.
Explanation:
It began at a point when the various insignificant city-state rules of the Spring and Autumn period had been incorporated into seven significant contenders and a few insignificant enclaves. It was disturbed by two hundred years of brutality and combat. It profited from the leadership of philosophers who struggled with the king. It encountered strong guidance from feudal chiefs under the king.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Though it was supposed to be separate but equal it wasn't. The African American accommodations were often worn down and dirty. While the White Americans were given much nicer and cleaner things. Also African Americans were treated very badly during the segregation era. <span />
