Answer:
80 (mark)only answer this
In this question the options are missing; here are the options:
Which best describes how Greg could find more information about the website to check for its validation?
Greg could assume it is valid because it is a .net.
Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.
Greg could look to see if the website was updated recently,
Greg could assume it is valid since Frank is not selling anything.
The answer to this question is B. Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.
Explanation:
One of the key factors that make a source to be credible is the expertise of the author because if the author is an expert in the area, the source is generally considered as credible. For example, the words of Isaac Newton are a credible source if these are related to areas such as maths, physics, or astronomy because he was an expert in this area. In this context, one way Greg could validate this source is by checking who is Frank Smith to verify if he is an expert in the topic. This makes option B correct.
Explanation:
In this scenario, the ideal would be to write a persuasive request, where there is an objective and logical explanation about the observed problem, in the case of the question, about the slowness of the sellers' expenses reimbursement system.
The persuasive request must be written strategically to convince the recipients and draw attention to their point of view. It must also be written in a way that gives credibility to create interest and motivation for the acceptance of your request.
Answer:
1. Current bonds price = $81.86.
2. Yield to maturity = 22.16%.
3. 3. Expected Return = 7.5%.
Explanation:
Required Rate = Rf + beta*MRP
= 5% + 0.25*(15% - 5%)
= 5% +0.25*10%
= 5% + 2.5% = 7.5%
Required Rate = 7.5%
Expected Future Value = 70% x $100 + 30% x $60
= (0.7*$100) + (0.3*$60)
= $(70+18) = $88
Expected Future Value = $88
1. Current bonds price = 88/1.075 = $81.86
2. Yield to maturity = 100/81.86 - 1 = 1.22159785-1 = 0.22159785 = 22.159785% = 22.16%
3. Expected Return = 7.5%
Answer:
b. safety
Explanation:
"it wants to make sure are taken care of in the future"
This means it prefers a safety investment.
The beta of the investment should be lower to reduce the deviation from the expected market return
The liquidity is not as important right now as the children are young. Once they start highschool or collegue Gina will need to make higer withdrawals. Plus, she want's to look into the future, this also is a clear inshight that Gina do not require liquidity right now
The market risk a global variance Gina cannot reduce the risk inherent to the market.
The business failure would be associate with safety which is a most suitable term.
