Answer:
A tender offer.
Explanation:
This is simple explained to be the offer put to place to execute a work or even services for a said/given price. These offers are typically said to be done publicly; shareholders in some cases a been put to place to sell their shares for a specified price and within a particular window of time. Target sales orders which are been tabled/offered are been usually placed at certain premium value which are effective in market price and is often contingent upon a minimum or a maximum number of shares sold. In many other cases, tender are seen to be in security forms or other non-cash alternatives are offered in exchange for shares.
Explanation:
Looking from a fair point of view, the White owners of businesses have legitimate reasons to feel that the Act constitutes illegal reverse discrimination.
Remember, reverse discrimination implies an unfair treatment of the majority group (White owners) in an effort to please the minority group. This is evident from the fact that the 10 percent of all federal grants to be released by the Economic Development Administration was only to be used to purchase services or supplies from businesses owned and controlled by U.S. citizens belonging to one of six minority groups excluding the White business owners; making the White owners feel discriminated against.
Thus, unintentionally the Act became a reverse discrimination on White business owners.
Answer:
A) Under no circumstances
Explanation:
Major Construction & Manufacturing Corporation makes a side payment to a government official in India. Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, this is permitted Under no circumstances
