Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency could be overturned through the subsequent Supreme ruling.
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency was a legal case in 2007. In this case, multiple cities and states including Massachusetts sued the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to force it to regulate the emission of pollutants.
Unexpectedly, EPA rejected the petition to control the emission of pollutants but the Supreme Court decided Massachusetts and the other petitioners had the right to sue EPA and that EPA needed to control the emission of pollutants including carbon dioxide.
This decision was quite controversial because 5 out of 9 justices approved it and many did not agree EPA had to control the emission of some pollutants. Because of this, the decision could be overturned through subsequent Supreme Court ruling that is the most common way to overturned previous decisions by the court that do not relate to the nation's fundamental law but specific laws.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1755400
I know the main one is British imperialism
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C.
Explanation:Aristotle examined the phenomena of the natural world.He practised a different style of science: systematically gathering data, discovering patterns common to whole groups of animals, and inferring possible causal explanations from these,this style is common in modern biology when large amounts of data become available in a new field.
Answer:
Common campaigning techniques include the following: Campaign advertising (e.g. using posters, radio and TV announcements) Attracting media attention (e.g. with press conferences and stunts) Demonstrations, rallies, marches and other forms of mass meetings
Explanation:
