The answer is multi-channeled.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The opponents of the message expressed in the cartoon might point to the McDonald versus Chicago case to support their critique.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- According to the Supreme Court ruling in the McDonald versus Chicago case, it had been clarified that the people's right to keep and bear arms applies to the state and the federal government equally.
- Thus, the opponents of the USA Patriot Act might bring to the surface the judgment given by the Supreme Court to serve their side against the new act.
Lucy is arguing from a humanistic perspective because she suggests that people have control over their destinies.
<h3>What is a Humanistic Perspective?</h3>
This is an approach to psychology that focuses on the whole and uniqueness of an individual.
Hence, because Lucy is a psychology graduate student and in her argument about how environment shapes destiny, she was of the opinion that people have control over their destinies which is a humanistic view,
Read more about humanistic perspective here:
brainly.com/question/6964971
If its an Apex question, add options next time.