Answer: EUPHEMISM.
Explanation: The Oxford dictionary defines Euphemism as "A mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing".
This is exactly the case in this question. The term search and destroy had become "blunt" and embarrassing. Therefore euphemism was employed in order to use more appropriate military words.
Throughout his sermon in Act 2, peter presents three pieces of evidence to convince his listeners that Jesus is God. The three pieces of evidence that peter appeals to are:
- Peter appeals to fulfilled prophecy. This proves that Jesus was the promised Messiah.
- He appeals to the miracles of Jesus as proof that he was from God.
- He appeals to eyewitness accounts of Jesus' resurrection as proof that he was God.
Peter's sermon of Acts 2 is critically very significant. This is because it denotes the way apostles interpreted the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, including the Ascension. Peter marks the Old Testament in this Sermon and cites texts which were fulfilled in the events of Jesus' life, but also the events of Pentecost. Here, the significance of the holy spirit is mentioned.
Learn more about Peter's sermon: https://brainly.in/question/12132717
#SPJ4
Leon works in the secondary sector.
Answer:
Has led some countries, such as France, to adopt policies to regulate foreign influences
Is where dominant groups (primarily in wealthier countries) press their culture on others
Explanation:
Cultural imperialism refers to the exercise of supremacy in cultural relations in which the ideals,values, traditions, social and moral norms of a dominant culture are imposed on the other non-dominant cultures. This type of imperialism in which the dominant community extends powerfully its authority over the other population by transforming the features of the culture of the non-dominant community.
<span>The Committee of the Whole only requires 100 members for a quorum, while only 25 members are required to force a recorded rather than voice vote. In the version of the Committee of the Whole that existed in the British House of Commons, the original use of this committee was to debate bills privately and prevent a recorded vote from being taken. It is normally invoked to give initial consideration of important legislation, including bills for raising revenue, and serves to expedite the process since debate over amendment occurs under a special five-minute rule.</span>
