The answer is like the second choice, “Africa’s river systems made it easy for Europeans to reach the the African interior”. We can determine this is correct by cancelling out the other options.
1- yes, Africa WAS rich in natural resources, but the Europeans did not care much for that. They had come to Africa for trade and slaves.
3- similar to A, the Europeans weren’t there because they were running out of space, yes they did conquer and claim lands in Africa, but the purpose of them being there was goods.
4- a lot like C, but not very relevant at all, especially since at this time the Europeans who were traveling definitely did not farm, they wanted their goods already prepared.
Since the other options have been ruled out, I will explain 2 a little bit. Obviously, the Europeans had sailed to Africa. At first the remained on the edges of it, taking over ports and just sailing along picking up slaves and continuing west. A good example of an African river used by the Europeans is the Congo River. It branches out throughout all of Congo and it’s historical importance is that an explorer named Henry Morton Stanley used it to continue into Africa. Though he may not sound familiar, we’ve all heard the phrase “Doctor Livingstone, I presume”. It was Stanley who said this once meeting with him.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Information systems are designed with the primary aim of gathering information and this stage is followed by the processing of the collected data for the purpose of storing and distributing it to business firms and other organizations.
As per the question, the given assertion would be categorized as true because it leads to comprehending an industry that is influenced by small retailers or local traders to shift to the large multinational strings through these systems that would aid them with making the strategies to direct their operations and interact with the customers more efficiently. Therefore, the given assertion is <u>true.</u>
The matching of the phrase to their meaning base on judicial system are;
- Judicial restraint: relies heavily on involves strict interpretation.
- judicial activism: courts play active role
- in shaping social policy.
<h3>What is judiciary system?</h3>
judiciary system serves as as as a system that deals with administration of justice in the Court of law.
Judicial activism is a philosophy which says judges can deviate from strict adherence of law while judicial restraint is the opposite.
When a court limits powers to strike down laws (judicial activism) means that there could be a little deviation from handling similar cases that has been handled before.
Learn more about judiciary system at;
brainly.com/question/4937540
#SPJ1
