5. In your own words, please expound upon Phipps' assertion that "since truth is one, the conflict is not between science and re
ligion, but between arrogant scientists and dogmatic religionists who have difficulty living within their partial knowledge." Do you agree or disagree with the author? Why or why not? Make sure to support your views with quotes from the text.
I recommend you to try analyzing this excerpt in order to compile your own response towards the depicted situation. As for me, there is one stated truth: if someone is really wise and assured that his sphere of occupation is reasonable , this person would never persuade people to believe him/ her and stand on his/her side, because this person does not have doubts about that. Does not matter in what such people believe, they do not have to prove it to anyone who does not shares their views.
Explanation: The common mistake that they make is, they forget to replace thymine with uracil as a base pair of Adenine. During DNA transcription Thymine is replaced by Uracil in production of messenger RNA. Uracil is a de-mythylated form of thymine and requires less energy to produce.
Nucleic acids are polymers of individual nucleotide monomers. Each nucleotide is composed of three parts: a 5-carbon sugar, a phosphate group, and a nitrogenous base.
