Appeasement was a popular policy because European leaders

Social Studies

2 answers:

Soloha48 [4]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: b. wanted to avoid another war.

Appeasement is a term most often applied to the foreign policy of the British Prime Ministers towards Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy between 1935 and 1939. It consisted of the ministers making concessions to the regimes.

These actions were driven by a desire to avoid another war due to the trauma of World War I. The policy has been a subject of debate for decades. Some scholars believe that appeasement was directly responsible for the power Adolf Hitler was able to gain.

Volgvan3 years ago

3 0

Appeasement was a popular policy because European leaders wanted to avoid another war.

You might be interested in

The largest category of primary malignant brain tumors that arise from cells in the cns are called:________

Anna71 [15]

The largest category of primary malignant brain tumors that arise from cells in the CNS are called <u>Gliomas</u>

A malignant brain tumor is a rapidly developing malignancy that can spread to the spine and other parts of the brain. According to their growth rate and propensity to recur after therapy, brain tumors are often rated from 1 to 4 based on their behavior. Grade 3 or 4 tumors are classified as malignant brain tumors, whereas grade 1 or 2 tumors are typically classified as benign or non-cancerous.

The majority of malignant brain tumors are secondary malignancies, meaning they first developed in another area of the body before spreading to the brain. Brain-originating tumors, or primary brain tumors, are those.

To know more about malignant brain tumors

brainly.com/question/12020868

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

Help please

jeyben [28]

Answer:

O A. Purposes of a study

5 0

3 years ago

two scientists failed to report unusual findings when they shared from a recent science expriment. Why is this not scientificall

Sedbober [7]

Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)

Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.

reference

Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.

3 0

3 years ago

What long-term effects did social isolation have on the rhesus monkeys in the Harlows' experiments?

romanna [79]

Social isolation of rhesus monkeys for the first 6 to 12 months of life produces severe and persistent behavioral effects including social withdrawal, rocking, huddling, self-clasping, stereotyped behaviors, and inappropriate heterosexual and maternal behaviors as adults.

3 0

2 years ago

A constitutional monarchy provides what power to a monarch

Vaselesa [24]

A constitutional monarchy it provides in which power to a monarchy it can be only in the form of power in the Constitution.

7 0

3 years ago