True, both sides underestimated each other's willpower of their population.
The correct answer is B) attitudes can influence us at different levels of conscious awareness.
The discrepancy between stated and unstated attitudes appear because attitudes can influence us at different levels of conscious awareness.
This conscious awareness and the social environment or circumstance directly affect the way people react or answer to a situation like this. It is difficult to accept in public, a behavior that could be questioned for the social repercussion, or in this case, for a comment that could be accused of being racist. Although the individual firmly believed in that statement, expressing it in public is a risk and probably he/she won't do it.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: An important insight that can be drawn from the research on happiness is that:___, would be, C: Objective realities are not as important as subjective feelings.
Explanation:
For a very long time, different fields of study, especially in the social sciences, have become interested in learning about what happiness is, how it is defined, what defines it, and what makes people perceive themselves as happy and what factors of life, both inside a person, and outside, play a role in the perception of happiness. Although happiness is essentially a very subjective and intangible concept, and its perception varies from one person to another, what studies on happiness have found though are certain common denominators among people who perceive themselves as happy, or unhappy. One such common denominator is the role that objective realities: having money, having a good job, a country doing well, play on the perception of happiness vs. subjective feelings. And the conclusions that have been drawn show that people perceive happiness more from subjective feelings than from objective realities, meaning, happiness in part depends on a person´s feelings, rather than what is measurable, tangible, and objective.
According to the u.s. federal research misconduct policy, fabrication involves "<span>making up data or results and recording or reporting them."
Research misconduct is characterized as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research.Fabrication is making up information or results and recording or detailing them, and falsification is controlling exploration materials, gear, or forms, or changing or discarding information or results with the end goal that the examination isn't precisely spoken to in the exploration record.</span>
