Tina and Tom are co-workers at Acme Corporation. As night custodians, they work together cleaning the Acme office building at night when the building is empty. Tom regularly makes sexual advances toward Tina that distress her. However, Tina has never complained-The statement that holds accurate is (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it</u>
Explanation:
Since ,Tina and Tom are co-workers and they also work together as night custodian .If Tina has some problem with the sexual advances /behavior made tom then she should immediately complain about the same to her immediate supervisor ,But in the case above Tina has not made any complain towards the harassment act of tom .
so,the answer (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it </u>holds True
Bills for raising revenue idk if that helps
3/4s of the States are needed to ratify an amendment to the Constitution.
Today, this would mean that 38 states would need to approve an amendment at the state level for the amendment to be added.
I believe the answer is: Halo effect
Halo effect refers to a situation when our impression toward another person blur our judgement about that person in other areas.
In the scenario above, due to the attraction that Vivica felt toward dion, she would much more likely to associate Dion with other various positive attributes that fit vivica's desire.
