Answer:
28 units sqr
Step-by-step explanation:
Area of Rectangle
A= Lw = 8(4) = 32
Area of Triangle
A= 
= 
= 4
32- 4 = 28 units sqr
Answer:
a) 615
b) 715
c) 344
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the Question,
- Given that, A study conducted by the Center for Population Economics at the University of Chicago studied the birth weights of 732 babies born in New York. The mean weight was 3311 grams with a standard deviation of 860 grams
- Since the distribution is approximately bell-shaped, we can use the normal distribution and calculate the Z scores for each scenario.
Z = (x - mean)/standard deviation
Now,
For x = 4171, Z = (4171 - 3311)/860 = 1
- P(Z < 1) using Z table for areas for the standard normal distribution, you will get 0.8413.
Next, multiply that by the sample size of 732.
- Therefore 732(0.8413) = 615.8316, so approximately 615 will weigh less than 4171
- For part b, use the same method except x is now 1591.
Z = (1581 - 3311)/860 = -2
- P(Z > -2) , using the Z table is 1 - 0.0228 = 0.9772 . Now 732(0.9772) = 715.3104, so approximately 715 will weigh more than 1591.
- For part c, we now need to get two Z scores, one for 3311 and another for 5031.
Z1 = (3311 - 3311)/860 = 0
Z2 = (5031 - 3311)/860= 2
P(0 ≤ Z ≤ 2) = 0.9772 - 0.5000 = 0.4772
approximately 47% fall between 0 and 1 standard deviation, so take 0.47 times 732 ⇒ 732×0.47 = 344.
<h3>
Short Answer: Yes, the horizontal shift is represented by the vertical asymptote</h3>
A bit of further explanation:
The parent function is y = 1/x which is a hyperbola that has a vertical asymptote overlapping the y axis perfectly. Its vertical asymptote is x = 0 as we cannot divide by zero. If x = 0 then 1/0 is undefined.
Shifting the function h units to the right (h is some positive number), then we end up with 1/(x-h) and we see that x = h leads to the denominator being zero. So the vertical asymptote is x = h
For example, if we shifted the parent function 2 units to the right then we have 1/x turn into 1/(x-2). The vertical asymptote goes from x = 0 to x = 2. This shows how the vertical asymptote is very closely related to the horizontal shifting.
Answer:
1793.75 m²
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
Total amount of land leased = 2050 m²
Fraction of land given to brother = 1/8
Amount of land given to brother :
1/8 * 2050 = 256.25 m²
Amount of land left :
2050 m² - 256.25 m²
= 1793.75 m²
the more years the money stays invested, the more interest it earns, so clearly, if the compounding cycle is the same for both options, and the rate of 7% is the same as well for both, then the one with more years will give more interest..
so depends on what "best" means in this context, but if it's more interest earned, 3 years gives more interest than 2 years of course.
