1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melamori03 [73]
3 years ago
6

14 points to help me out with Geometry

Mathematics
2 answers:
Nataly [62]3 years ago
5 0
X=16 ur welcome i tried to do my best I solved it on a paper
Ede4ka [16]3 years ago
4 0
Since f and g are parallel to eachother, the sum of the angle 7x and 2x+36 would equal 180. To solve for x, you add 7x+2x+36, set it equal to 180, and then solve for x. 

x= 16
You might be interested in
A jet plane traveling at 450 mph overtakes a propeller plane traveling at 250 mph that had a 3​-hour head start. How far from th
Anon25 [30]
It's suppose to add 450mph+250mph=700 then divide 3 hours=233.3
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Factor 13
REY [17]

Answer:

According to the text(Beowulf), what feelings likely drove the original owner of the treasure hoard to bury it? How

Step-by-step explanation:

v

8 0
3 years ago
If a textbook has a mass of 2.2kg and weighs 19.6 newtons on Venus what is the strength of gravity on Venus?
Neporo4naja [7]
G=mg=>g=G/m=8,9m/s^2
7 0
3 years ago
3. A team of eye surgeons has developed a new technique for a risky eye operation to restore the
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Yes the new method if sample size was less than 20 than that of old method or identical sample numbers of old and new the differences still prove the new operation is better. As 88 patients minus 1% still shows us 76.7475 significance of  old method being low point 67.5 = 30% of 225 and proved a 65.25 low point and 69.75 high point which is also a 20% jump to new methods low point significance.

You cna show this as workings to prove or follow any of the below statements.

Where new method of 88 patients -0.01 significance rate stands at 76.7475. This figure has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients to 76.7 we compare this to the old method if reversing significance we find  = 62.5 and it's 30% standing value of 67.5  as +1% increase shows us 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

Step-by-step explanation:

88/225  = 0.39111111111 = 39.11%%

P value 01 = 1%  =  225.225 or 5% range of alternative hypotheses.

To graph the P value we take the distance between the sample mean and the null hypothesis value (225 + 1% of sample - x nhv) = y ). We can graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean  (225 +/- ( x +1% of sample) where nhv has a decimal if needed to utilize the 1% added). we would replace nvp in this example with  Ha or H1 which means the alternative hypotheses as the data shows less than or equal to.

We can then show 225.225 -  Ha or H1  then graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is at least extreme in both tails  Ha or H1

However it would be the other way round where you take the first set of data and use the sample as the 30% significance of that sample indicates it may be a larger sample or a higher significance. Therefore this would be used in the graphing - 1%

We prove that 30-1 =29  where 29% of 225 = 225 x 0.29 = 65.25

this way we have proved that the new set of data being equal to 88 patients regaining their eyesight is <23 and can be written like this 65.25< x <88

This means that sample mean has taken the 1% to show on the graph we can show 225> 33.11 +1 .

We can prove that both indifference of significance would reduce when 1% is added and close based on being a higher percentage to begin with.

34.11 = 0.3411 x 225 = 76.7475 for second surgeon = 33.11% +1

Where as shown

30 = 0.3 x 225 = 67.5

76.5475 - 67.5 = 9.04 difference when comparing old method = +1%

where new method stands at 76.7475 has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients and where old method if reversing = 62.5 and has reduced from 67.5  as +1% and 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

You would therefore graph each higher methods first if comparing both by 0.01 or show 88 on graph and 76.7475 = +1%

NB/ if sample size was 20 more in the old data then 225+20 = 245 x 0.29 = 71.05 and would still be lower than new data. = 2.0 increase level of significance and not relevant unless you are looking for the decrease which means new is greater than 20% success than that of old method findings where 30% = 67.5.

5 0
3 years ago
I need help with this math can someone explain it please?
andreyandreev [35.5K]
There is no question
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of (3/4)^3?
    13·1 answer
  • A right rectangular prism has a length of 20.2 cm, a width of 9.1 cm and a height of 14.3 cm. What is the surface area of the ri
    5·2 answers
  • Least to greatest 7/12,0.75,5/6
    7·2 answers
  • - A high score for a video game is
    8·2 answers
  • there are 15 pieces of fruit in a bowl and 9 of them are oranges what is the percent of the peices of fruit in the bowl​
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following additional statements would you need to prove these two triangles are similar by SAS similarity?
    10·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me with this plz
    13·1 answer
  • Please answer quick! Will give Brainliest, 5 stars, and I will like your answer!!
    9·2 answers
  • Rubin has 6 rolls of pennies containing 50 coins each
    9·1 answer
  • 2/3-5/6what is 2 / 3 - 5 / 6 ​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!