Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
An extraneous solution is a root of a transformed equation which is not a root of the original equation because it was not included in the domain of the original equation.
Ahmed is solving
for x.
His steps were:
![\begin{aligned}2\sqrt[3]{x-7}&=-8\\ \sqrt[3]{x-7}&=-4\\ \left(\sqrt[3]{x-7}\right)^3&=(-4)^3\\ x-7&=-64 \end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D2%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx-7%7D%26%3D-8%5C%5C%20%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx-7%7D%26%3D-4%5C%5C%20%20%5Cleft%28%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx-7%7D%5Cright%29%5E3%26%3D%28-4%29%5E3%5C%5C%20%20x-7%26%3D-64%20%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
Since cube roots <u>do not give two solutions when solved</u>, it is <u>not necessary </u>to check his answers for extraneous solutions.
The formula is y=0.5m+20
You start (0,20) then for each mile you increase by 0.5.
Or
Since the x axis is by two, then every two miles you increase by 1 mile. So (0,20); (2,21); (4,22); (6,23); (8,24).
Answer:
where's the worksheet
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Basically, this is an observational study because the researcher does not apply any treatment.
It's not an experiment because there is no experimentation involved. :)
It's not double-blind because in that case the researcher would have to apply something to two kinds of groups. one aware one the other not. not the case.
It's not D because The observations are comparing two kinds of subjects and they are not looking for a cause and effect.
reflexive postulate of equality