I was never sure of what the "additive inverse" is.
So, just now, just for you, I went and looked it up.
The additive inverse of any number ' A ' is the number
that you need to ADD to A to get zero. That's all !
So now, let's check out the choices:
a), 6, -(-6)
That second number, -(-6), is the same as +6 .
So the two numbers are the same.
Do you get zero when you add them up ? No.
b). -7, 7
What do you get when you add -7 and 7 ?
You get zero.
So these ARE additive inverses.
c). -7, -7
What do you get when you add -7 to -7 ?
You get -14 . That's not zero, so these
are NOT additive inverses.
d). 7, 7
What do you get when you add 7 to 7 ?
You get 14. That's NOT zero, so these
are NOT additive inverses.
e). 6, -6
What do you get when you add 6 to -6 ?
You get zero.
So these ARE additive inverses.
What do we end up with from the list of choices:
a)., c)., and d). are NOT additive inverses.
b). and e). ARE additive inverses.
Answer:
none of the two graphs in the pic.
it should be one in the II quadrant
Step-by-step explanation:
the plus four means to move 4 to the left
the plus 2 means to move up 2
That would make the vertex in the II quadrant.
The answer is D transformation.
In the proportional theory,
28 units is the total measurement that includes 8 units.
So, 10 + 3x - 5 is the total measurement that includes 10 units proportionally.
This means,
28 = 10 + 3x - 5
Now solve for x,
28 = 10 + 3x - 5
28 - 10 = 3x - 5
18 + 5 = 3x
23 = 3x
23 / 3 = x
So x = 23/3 or 7.6666....
Answer:
(2,1) (7,1) (7,5) (2,5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Just line up the dots on the x axis and y axis
Vertexes are the points or "corners" of the shape, and in your case, that square.
I hope this helped :D
