All categories

3 years ago

Which statement best explains the law of supply?

Business

2 answers:

Julli [10]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

<h3><em>The answer is </em><u><em>A</em></u></h3>

Explanation:

The quantity supplied by producers increases as prices rise and decreases as prices fall.

oee [108]3 years ago

5 0

(P.S. - in the future you will get better help when you add the possible answer choices!)

The law of supply states that, all other things equal/consistent) an increase in price will result in an increase in supply.

This is because as the price of a product goes up and up, more and more companies will be willing to sell it. The inverse is also true.. as the price goes down, fewer companies will bother selling the item.

You might be interested in

The following data are for a series of increasingly extensive flood-control projects.

marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

$28,000 and $12,000, respectively

Explanation:

Marginal cost = incremental cost from Plan C to Plan D

= total cost (plan D) - total cost (plan C)

= 72,000 - 44,000 = $28,000

Marginal benefit = incremental benefit from Plan C to Plan D

= total benefit (plan D) - total benefit (plan C)

= 64,000 - 52,000 = $12,000

Therefore marginal cost and benefits for Plan D = $28,000 and $12,000, respectively

4 0

3 years ago

Barbara is a producer in a monopoly industry. Her demand curve, total revenue curve, marginal revenue curve and total cost curve

andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

Explanation:

A monopoly will maximize profit at MR = MC ( marginal revenue = marginal cost)72

MR =MC

40 -0.5 Q = 4

-0.5 Q = 4 - 40 = -36

Q = -36 / -0.5 = 72

The price of the her product

Q = 160 - 4P

4P = 160 - 72 = 88

P = 88 / 4 = 22

4 0

2 years ago

Evaluating od interventions always involves measuring their impact on employee satisfaction, productivity, and the bottom line.

Usimov [2.4K]

False. Evaluating interventions always involves measuring their impact on employee satisfaction, productivity, and the bottom line.

<h3>What is evaluating interventions?</h3>

A number of creative methods for conflict-resolution evaluation have been developed, despite the fact that conflict-resolution interventions are often evaluated on an as-needed basis.

1. Participants' Evaluation

Participatory evaluation is an evaluation strategy that is "bottom-up" or "people-centered."

2. Utilization-Focused Evaluation

In a utilization-focused evaluation, a group of "intended users" is identified who choose the "intended uses" for the evaluation data.

3. Impact Evaluation

The goal of an impact evaluation is to ascertain how effective an intervention is. Theoretically, this is straightforward, but the community involved in conflict resolution has not yet sufficiently defined the word "effect."

4. Action Evaluation

By encouraging stakeholders to define and track success, Action Evaluation seeks to assure the effectiveness of initiatives.

5. Macro-Evaluation

Macro-Evaluation, generally speaking, is to ascertain how grassroots micro-level initiatives 'ripple up' to the regional or national level.

To learn more about Evaluation of interventions visit:

brainly.com/question/28065744

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

O'Brien Ltd.'s outstanding bonds have a $1,000 par value, and they mature in 25 years. Their nominal yield to maturity is 9.25%,

kozerog [31]

Answer: