When proprietors decide to combine their business and form a partnership, gaap usually requires that non cash assets be taken over at : C. fair market vale
The data will be used to calculate the percentages of ownership of each combined companies
hope this helps
The more information an entrepreneur acquires during the process of feasibility analysis, the higher the chance that his or her predictions will be close to the mark, risk will be reduced, and uncertainty managed.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The study or examination about the extent to which the proposed idea will be practical and can be achieved at an economic manner refers to the feasibility study. In business it is very essential to decide whether to take up a project or not. It also helps in narrowing the project and plan accordingly.
It also helps in making predictions about whether the expected results can be attained from a particular idea or a project. Thus during the feasibility study the entrepreneur must obtain as much information as possible as it helps him in the evaluation of risks, uncertainties and other related things.
The study of an agent's or individual's decisions is known as decision theory. The official decision-making process concludes with evaluation. Evaluating the consequences may assist the decision-maker in learning lessons that will help her make better decisions in the future.
- Loss aversion is the correct answer because the general notion of the "loss-aversion" theory is that if an individual is provided with two equal alternatives, one of which is presented in terms of prospective profits and the other in terms of potential losses, the former option will be chosen.
- Loss aversion is a cognitive bias or psychological phenomenon that explains why the agony of losing is twice as powerful psychologically as the pleasure of winning.
Therefore, representativeness, cognitive bias, and overconfidence are not factors relative to an arbitrary decision distortion. So, Loss aversion is the correct response to the question.
For more information regarding arbitrary baseline, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/11224360
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
