Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
Answer:
see Below
Explanation:
trans-atlantic trade promoted colonies since colonial powers could now use foreign nations as a trading post and get cheaper, government-subsidized products by colonizing places with different exports. Mercantilism promotes imperialism, tariffs and subsidies on traded goods to achieve peak economical strength, so it's no surprise imperialist powers used tariffs on colonists and subsidies on colonial goods in their home countries! Also, mercantilism promotes exports and minimizes imports (sound familiar? colonies were sort of puppet organizations of a larger empire, where the colonies would just export goods the empire wanted to trade with or buy cheaper).
During the prosperity of the america during 1920, it is not well distributed. nearly half of its population still resides in the rural areas where there priary source of income is farimg
<span>Seneca Falls, New York</span>
