Answer: C) Is accepted as true until proven false
==========================================================
Explanation:
We cannot prove the hypothesis to be 100% true because there might be data out there that we haven't accounted for, or some scenario that we haven't thought of yet. There's always going to be room for uncertainty and doubt. Keep in mind that such doubt does not necessarily mean that the theory is automatically false.
So all of this rules out choice A.
Choice B is ruled out as well because data supporting a hypothesis doesn't falsify the hypothesis. The term "falsify" means "to prove false" as you'd expect.
Choice C is the answer because the data seems to support the hypothesis and again we leave room for error. It's quite possible that in some unspecified date in the future, there are better methods of measurement to get a better sense of what's going on.
Choice D is ruled out because a law refers to something like the law of gravity. It's something you observe but it doesn't explain why something works. It doesn't provide the underlying mechanics of what's going on. We simply just report what we see which is exactly what an observation is.
Consensus democracy is commonly defined as <u>a process of decision-making that considers varying opinions, not just taking into account opinions that are held by the majority. </u>
In Kohlberg’s theory of moral development, consensus democracy is necessary <em>because it is one of the primary mechanism that an individual can utilize to develop his or her morality from pre-conventional to post-conventional level.</em>
The statement that is not true about Devaj's role in the father's health care is that Devaj may make any decision he wishes, even if it goes against the wishes described in the living will. That is option A.
<h3>What is living will?</h3>
A living will is a legal document that is written by an individual which states how such wishes to be treated should incase they no more have the ability to communicate and make decisions for themselves.
Power of attorney is granted by that same individual to another trusted and capable individual to act on his behalf according to what he has written in his living will.
Therefore, the statement that is not true about Devaj's role in the father's health care is that Devaj may make any decision he wishes, even if it goes against the wishes described in the living will.
Learn more about living will here:
brainly.com/question/3239989
#SPJ1
Chlorine has the potential to break up the ozone layer (along with bromine)
Family is coined by our society to consist of parents and their children. Based on our modern day families, we now have couples with no children, couples that form with children from previous marriages, gay couples, etc.
People want to belong, they have a need to identify with others when their "family" at home is broken. We also come to realize that our family unit can be viewed differently in our society.
For instance, gangs consider other members their "family." I don't believe there is a such thing as "normal" family. We all want to belong to a group to feel like we are contributing to our society, whether that be through a "normal" family or a more modern day version of family.
I hope my thoughts provided some insight/ideas.
