The generalizability of a study increases when: E) The sample is more representative of the population.
The generalizability of a study is simply a measure of how useful, relatable and relevant the results of a study are for a larger (broader) percentage of a population. Thus, a study is considered to have good generalizability when its results are broadly useful and applicable to a larger (broader) percentage of a population.
Basically, the generalizability of a study is the application of research findings and test results based on a particular sample to a larger (broader) population.
This ultimately implies that, a sample is considered to be more representative of a population when the generalizability of a study increases.
Read more here: brainly.com/question/17422766
It puts decision making power in the hands of a few people who may act impulsively or simply make incorrect decisions. You could probably search online for more information.
The answer would be D. All of the above
Answer:
Flooding is a major disturbance that impacts aquatic ecosystems and the ecosystem services that they provide. Predicted increases in global flood risk due to land use change and water cycle intensification will likely only increase the frequency and severity of these impacts. Extreme flooding events can cause loss of life and significant destruction to property and infrastructure, effects that are easily recognized and frequently reported in the media. However, flooding also has many other effects on people through freshwater aquatic ecosystem services, which often go unrecognized because they are less evident and can be difficult to evaluate. Here, we identify the effects that small magnitude frequently occurring floods (< 10-year recurrence interval) and extreme floods (> 100-year recurrence interval) have on ten aquatic ecosystem services through a systematic literature review. We focused on ecosystem services considered by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment including: (1) supporting services (primary production, soil formation), (2) regulating services (water regulation, water quality, disease regulation, climate regulation), (3) provisioning services (drinking water, food supply), and (4) cultural services (aesthetic value, recreation and tourism). The literature search resulted in 117 studies and each of the ten ecosystem services was represented by an average of 12 ± 4 studies. Extreme floods resulted in losses in almost every ecosystem service considered in this study. However, small floods had neutral or positive effects on half of the ecosystem services we considered. For example, small floods led to increases in primary production, water regulation, and recreation and tourism. Decision-making that preserves small floods while reducing the impacts of extreme floods can increase ecosystem service provision and minimize losses.
Explanation:
Effects of token economics on establishing social skills amongst children with emotional disturbances
defense mechanisms used by depressed adults and children in stressful situations