Attribution theory is first impression reflects, as was packing her car with boxes of food for a local food pantry. person assume that she regularly does volunteer work, cares about the community.
<h3>What does attribution theory explain?</h3>
The social perceiver's utilization of information to arrive at causal explanations for events is the subject of attribution theory.
It investigates how information is acquired and used to arrive at a causal conclusion." People, according to Heider, are naive psychologists attempting to make sense of the social reality.
Thus, it is called Attribution theory.
For more details about Attribution theory., click here
brainly.com/question/22970509
#SPJ1
Answer:
1.What is Donald Trumps last daughters first name?
2. What song was playing in the background when President Trump made his exiting speech?
3. Did President elect Biden attend church this morning?
4.Since President is now out of the White house does he still have power as a president until Biden is the official President.
5. Who is the 46th president?
6. Who is the first woman vice president?
7. What are the 3 branches of government?
8. Name a quote from Doctor Martin Luther King?
9. What sorority is the first woman vice president a member of?
10. Who was Biden a vice president to?
Explanation:
1. Tiffany
2.YMCA
3.yes
4. yes
5. Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.
6. Kamala Harris
7. legislative executive and judicial
8. The time is always right to do what is right
9. Alpha Kappai Alpha
10. Barack Obama
The institutional resource in which <span> leaders both appointed by the president and approved by the Senate is: The Cabinet
The cabinet filled by the people that the president's trust themselves to handle specific aspects of their governmental plans. The senate, however, has the basis to accuse that a cabinet candidate is unsuited for the position and filibuster him/her.</span>
Answer:The court’s decision ruled that the laws of Louisiana were not in conflict with the Constitution. The justices wrote that Plessy’s defense wrongly assumed that separate facilities somehow made one race automatically inferior to another.
Further, they ruled that if one race is already socially inferior to another, there was nothing that the Constitution or other acts of legislation could do to fix that. To this end, the majority opinion states that the Fourteenth Amendment “could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”
Explanation: This comes directly from the answer.
