A scientific theory is what you are talking about.
Answer:
The correct answer is ''ability to take the role''.
Explanation:
George Herbert Mead was a social psychologist who explained that the human societies in which we are interested are forest societies. The human individual is a self, only insofar as he takes the attitude of the other towards himself. Insofar as that attitude is that of a certain number of others, insofar as he can adopt the organized attitudes of a certain number of others who are cooperating in a common activity, he takes the group's attitudes towards himself, by taking that or those attitudes, is defining the object of the group that which defines and controls response. For Mead this is possible insofar as people are capable of internalizing the behavior of others, we are capable of acting knowing the behavior that others will do. By internalizing the "generalized other", that is, the attitudes of others, the individual behaves in a certain way.
Answer:
Statistic is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Although Kinsey relied on the <u>collection of data</u> for study and future book, to believe we should take into account other environmental factors that<u> also affect the sexuality of men and women.</u>
Explanation:
Kinsey was encouraged to<em> talk about sexuality in times where it was morally prohibited.</em>
He started a <u>series of interview</u>s and launched his first writing about men and then another one referring to female sexuality. Criticisms came to him because <u>he did not take into account the complex psychological, cultural and emotional processes that enter into sexuality</u>. From his biologist's vision, <em>he ignored the deep and still inexplicable causes that generate sexual arousal </em>and that recent studies have shown that they are linked to the cultural range with which we grew up.
Similarly, there are <em>still huge sectors of society that have not adopted a tolerant vision and apparently it is still quite difficult to carry out studies on sexuality for all the moral issues that arise. </em>Someday we will understand where it comes from or at what point in history we found it so difficult to recognize and externalize this fundamental part of our existence, of our body and otherwise so natural and necessary.
"Try to recall information among distractions" is not taken a strategy for "committing information" to "one's long-term memory".
Option: C
<u>Explanation</u>:
Humans store information in two parts one is short-term memory called as temporary store and long-term memory which is known as relatively permanent store. To fetch out information from one's long term memory being in distracted situation can never result good but distributing information into manageable small chits, linking information with stored ideas, categorizing information etc such things can be approximately productive to conclude the need of information.
