First read through the poem without analyzing. Then read through it again and start to highlight important bits in it. Then you read the bits you have analyzed and you explain whether the phrase or word could signify something and have a meaning. And that's about it :)
Choose the best answer:
Review the argument.
Claim #1: David likes peanut butter.
Claim #2: Some people who like peanut butter are jk word.
Conclusion: David is a jk word.
Which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?
A preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Muir reflects on the powerful experience of finding the Calypso Borealis.
Explanation:
Answer:
Conflict
Explanation:
As a reader you are eager to find out how the conflict is resolved. When it gets to the highest level and when it becomes resolved
Hello. I don't know what evidence you mentioned in your previous assignment, which makes it impossible for me to answer your question efficiently. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way, showing you how to justify the chosen doubts.
you must justify the evidence based on the importance it has in the story you read. If you selected evidence where Douglass reflects on the importance of education, you can justify it by using the fact that education is liberating and would allow slaves to have enough knowledge to fight for themselves. If you used evidence about the misrepresentation that slavery imposes on society, you can justify how slavery is based on dominance and humiliation, generating results as depressing as the process itself.
