I think you are missing information to solve this problem. Should there me an image attached to this question.
Either way, to solve for the label, the label would most likely me a rectangle when laid flat.
It's dimensions would be length x height.
Where height is most likely "h"
and
length is most likely the circumference (2πr)
Thus the possible answers are either:
B or C
I can't answer it until I see an image when more detail.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
6. No. See explanation below.
7. 18 months
8. 16
Step-by-step explanation:
6. To rewrite a sum of two numbers using the distributive property, the two numbers must have a common factor greater than 1.
Let's find the GCF of 85 and 99:
85 = 5 * 17
99 = 3^2 + 11
5, 3, 11, and 17 are prime numbers. 85 and 99 have no prime factors in common. The GCF of 85 and 99 is 1, so the distributive property cannot be used on the sum 85 + 99.
Answer: No because the GCF of 85 and 99 is 1.
7.
We can solve this problem with the lest common multiple. We need to find a number of a month that is a multiple of both 6 and 9.
6 = 2 * 3
9 = 3^2
LCM = 2 * 3^2 = 2 * 9 = 18
Answer: 18 months
We can also answer this problem with a chart. We write the month number and whether they are home or on a trip. Then we look for the first month in which both are on a trip.
Month Charlie Dasha
1 home home
2 home home
3 home home
4 home home
5 home home
6 trip home
7 home home
8 home home
9 home trip
10 home home
11 home home
12 trip home
13 home home
14 home home
15 home home
16 home home
17 home home
18 trip trip
Answer: 18 months
8.
First, we find the prime factorizations of 96 an 80.
96 = 2^5 * 3
80 = 2^4 *5
GCF = 2^4 = 16
Answer: 16
the answer to this problem is 4
Answer:
4/11
Step-by-step explanation:
I got the question wrong and it told me the right answer.
Answer:
1 solution
Step-by-step explanation:
Jeremy can simplify the equation enough to determine if the x-coefficient on one side of the equation is the same or different from the x-coefficient on the other side. Here, that simplification is ...
-3x -3 +3x = -3x +3 +3
We see that the x-coefficient on the left is 0; on the right, it is -3. These values are different, so there is one solution.
__
In the attached, the left-side expression is called y1; the right-side expression is called y2. The two expressions are equal where the lines they represent intersect. That point of intersection is x=3. (For that value of x, both sides of the equation have a value of -3.)
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
If the equation's x-coefficients were the same, we'd have to look at the constants. If they're the same, there are an infinite number of solutions. If they are different, there are no solutions.
