Answer:
b. informational social influence
Explanation:
Informational social influence is a psychological or social phenomenon that describes the tendency of an individual to accept the information of others we consider accurate and correct most especially when faced with ambiguity or obscurity. We simply conform to the opinions of others we believe have an accurate information we seem not to have. In such situation, we simply conform to what they are doing because we believe they are right.
When participants in an experiment conform to others' answers as explained in the scenario given in the question, we can infer that it best illustrates the <em>impact of informational social influence</em> rather than influence from peers.
Lack of resources in general
It may also mean shortage of flora and fauna
<span>CorrectThe direction of the electric field stays the same regardless of the sign of the charges that are free to move in theconductor.Mathematically, you can see that this must be true since the expression you derived for the electric field isindependent of .Physically, this is because the force due to the magnetic field changes sign as well and causes positive charges tomove in the direction (as opposed to pushing negative charges in the direction). Therefore the result isalways the same: positive charges on the side and negative charges on the side. Because the electric fieldgoes from positive to negative charges will always point in the direction (given the original directions of</span>
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Central Asia is the land of the Silk Road, Marco Polo's explorations, and nomads living in yurts. Several countries across this region became independent with the collapse of the Soviet Union, but many signs of communist rule are still around.[ i just searched this up]
in my opinion, if you read the paragraph above you can easily identify that there were yurts in the soviet reign.
<span>Jerome operates under heteronomous morality while Hani is operating under autonomous morality. Under Jerome's schema, the outcome of the action and the rules of the world determine the morality of an action, without understanding the intentions or the mitigating factors that might be at play. Autonomous morality, however, sees that there are shades of grey to every situation and that morality does not always require a punishment for every action or transgression.</span>
