Answer:
they both had little success in stopping violence
Explanation:
Answer: This is an example of HINDSIGHT BIAS.
Explanation: Hindsight bias is defined as the tendency for an individual to calculate too highly the ability to have seen the outcome of an event. It is also known as the knew-it-all-along phenomenon or creeping determinism individuals here feel they already know what will happen after it has happened.
The phrase "life is lived forwards, but understood backwards." is a typical example because for an individual to understand life backwards, it must have already happened. Which is what hindsight bias explains an already occur event. More like predicting the past.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Answer:
here is your answer
Explanation:
scientific study
In a scientific study, a control group is used to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by isolating the effect of an independent variable. Researchers change the independent variable in the treatment group and keep it constant in the control group. Then they compare the results of these groups.
The assumptions are that if you cut taxes and costs for companies, then the company owners and investors will be able to bring about the growth of economy and employ more pepople. The benefits were that the economy entered a peacetiime and people were generally living better. The bad side was that public debt increased by a lot and this would come back to haunt the people later after Reagan was long gone.
Answer: Boycotting basically
shoutout to: @Greenleafable
remain heartless
