Answer:
common ethical standards across cultures, societies, and religion can be used to judge behavior.
Explanation:
Ethic can be defined as a set of both written and unwritten principles, values or rules of moral conduct that guides (governs) human behaviors. It's a reflection that is typically based on identifying what is good or bad, right or wrong and just or unjust with respect to human behaviors.
Ethical universalism posits that common ethical standards or meta-ethical position are universally applicable.
According to the school of ethical universalism, common ethical standards across cultures, societies, and religion can be used to judge the behavior of the people living within a geographical area.
In the late 1800's, economic, political and religious motives prompted European nations to expand their rule over other regions with the goal to make the empire bigger. The Industrial Revolution of the 1800's created a need for natural resources to fuel the newly invented machinery and transportation.
Answer:
They needed laws to create stability and security in the new land. What did the Mayflower Compact accomplish? It accomplished setting laws for the general good of the colony. ... The Mayflower Compact was important because it was a key step in the development of representative, democratic government in America.
Explanation:
Answer:
Not misusing the school‘s property, not bringing in weapons or drugs, and being kind to all of your teachers and classmates.
Explanation:
There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
